Jarasans Blog

Just the facts.

Sunday, February 1, 2009

Food for thought.

Food for thought. There are always ways to play with numbers to make a point. However, this one got my attention. I can only dream.

"The Proposal"

Whena company falls on difficult times, one of the things that seems tohappen is they reduce their staff and workers. The remainingworkers need to find ways to continue to do a good job or risk thattheir job would be eliminated as well. Wall Street, and the medianormally congratulate the CEO for making this type of "toughdecision", and his board of directors gives him a big bonus .

Our government should not be immune from similar risks.

Therefore: Reduce the House of Representatives from the current 435 members to 218 members and Senate members from 100 to 50 (one per State). Also reduce remaining staff by 25%.

Accomplish this over the next 8 years. (two steps / two elections) and of course this would require some redistricting.

SomeYearly Monetary Gains Include:

$44,108,400 for elimination of base pay for congress. (267 members X $165,200 pay /member / yr.)

$97,175,000 for elimination of the above people's staff. (estimate $1.3Million in staff per each member of the House, and $3 Million instaff per each member of the Senate every year)

$240,294 for the reduction in remaining staff by 25%.

$7,500,000,000reduction in pork barrel ear-marks each year. (those memberswhose jobs are gone. Current estimates for total government porkearmarks are at $15Billion / yr )

The remaining representatives would need to work smarter and would needto improve efficiencies. It might even be in their bestinterests to work together for the good of ourcountry?

Wemay also expect that smaller committees might lead to a moreefficient resolution of issues as well. It might evenbe easier to keep track of what your representative is doing.

Congresshas more tools available to do their jobs than it had back in 1911 when the current number of representatives was established.(telephone, computers, cell phones to name a few)

Note:

Congressdid not hesitate to head home when it was a holiday, when the nation needed a real fix to the economic problems. Also, we have 3senators that have not been doing their jobs for the past 18+months (on the campaign trail) and still they all have beenaccepting full pay. These facts alone support a reduction insenators & congress.

Summary of opportunity:

$44,108,400 reduction of congress members.

$282,100,000 for elimination of the reduced house member staff.

$150,000,000 for elimination of reduced senate member staff.

$59,675,000 for 25% reduction of staff for remaining house members.

$37,500,000 for 25% reduction of staff for remaining senate members.

$7,500,000,000 reduction in pork added to bills by the reduction of congress members.

$8,073,383,400 per year , estimated total savings. (that's 8-BILLION just to start!)

Big business does these types of cuts all the time.

If Congresspersons were required to serve 20, 25 or 30 years (likeeveryone else) in order to collect retirement benefits there is notelling how much we would save. Now they get full retirement after serving only ONE term .

IF you are happy how the Congress spends our taxes, well........ IF you are NOT at all happy, then I assume you know whatto do.

P.S. Daschle is going to pay his taxes.

http://www.mlive.com/us-politics/index.ssf/2009/01/daschle_takes_a_bad_firstday_h.html

posted by jarasan # 9:35 AM

Comments:

Savings as a reduction in pork induced bloat ........ priceless.

Enacting Fair Tax as it's currently written would effectively rein in government spending because their available funds are directly controlled by our own spending. IRS would be eliminated, therefore remove forced collection of taxes.

# posted by konane : 9:46 AM

Here is a link to a special message ad from 200 economists in the paper today,

copy/paste to view the ad,

http://www.cato.org/special/stimulus09/cato_stimulus.pdf

# posted by jarasan : 10:16 AM

This would be a good start. But the 50 states would do just fine without a federal government at all. Each state could appoint one person to the "senate". The senate would have no law-making powers...it's sole function would be to provide a venue for inter-state matters and to facilitate trade between the states and the world markets.

Our federal government is not the cure for our problems, it is the cause of our problems. Ooops...gotta run...the FEMA boys are here to take me to camp!

# posted by Rick G : 11:05 AM

Federal Elimination of Most Americans?

# posted by jarasan : 11:56 AM

Archives

April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007