Harry's Solar Company
The Solar thing just got a little more interesting.......REALLY!
The Tonopah Solar company in Harry Reid's Nevada is getting a $737 million loan from Obama's DOE.
The project will produce a 110 megawatt power system and employ 45 permanent workers.
That's costing us just $16 million per job.
One of the investment partners in this endeavor is Pacific Corporate Group (PCG).
The PCG executive director is Ron Pelosi, who is the brother to Nancy's husband.
He is also the uncle of California's Lt. Governor Calvin Newsome
Don't ask any questions, just move along folks.....nuthin' crooked goin' on here.
http://www.factcheck.org/2011/12/ron-pelosis-connection-to-tonopah-solar-energy/
The SOTUS campaign speech had several props last night including the Buffett secretary she makes between $200,000.00 and $500,000.00 that is somewhere around a half million dollars. Oh yeah, and the FLOTUS <snip>tail dress was a $2500 designer model. That speech was riddled with made up $h1T all over the place.
This is from Forbes:
Warren Buffett's Secretary Likely Makes Between $200,000 And $500,000/Year
Warren Buffet’s secretary, Debbie Bosanek, served as a stage prop for President Obama’s State of the Union speech. She was the President’s chief display of the alleged unfairness of our tax system – a little person paying a higher tax rate than her billionaire boss.
We can get an approximate answer by consulting IRS data on tax rates by adjusted gross income, which would approximate her salary, assuming she does not have significant dividend, interest or capital-gains income (like her boss). I assume Buffet keeps her too busy for her to hold a second job. I also do not know if she is married and filing jointly. If so, it is deceptive for Obama to use her as an example. The higher rate may be due to her husband’s income. So I assume the tax rate Obama refers to is from her own earnings.
Insofar as Buffet (like Mitt Romney) earns income primarily from capital gains, which are taxed at 15 percent (and according to Obama need to be raised for reasons of fairness), we need to determine how much income a taxpayer like Bosanek must earn in order to pay an average tax rate above fifteen percent. This is easy to do.
The IRS publishes detailed tax tables by income level. The latest results are for 2009. They show that taxpayers earning an adjusted gross income between $100,000 and $200,000 pay an average rate of twelve percent. This is below Buffet’s rate; so she must earn more than that. Taxpayers earning adjusted gross incomes of $200,000 to $500,000, pay an average tax rate of nineteen percent. Therefore Buffet must pay Debbie Bosanke a salary above two hundred thousand.
We must wait for further details to learn how much more than $200,000 she earns. The tax tables tell us about average ranges. For all we know she earns closer to a half million each year, but that is pure speculation.
I have nothing against Debbie Bosanke earning a half million or even more. Buffet is a major player in the world economy. His secretary deserves good compensation. At her income, however, she is scarcely the symbol of injustice that Obama wishes her to project.
I imagine that there are any number of secretaries who would want her job and her place in the Congress gallery for the President’s State of the Union address.
Maryland delegate moves to ban rat trafficking, 'protect our borders'
A Republican delegate in Maryland plans to introduce legislation to protect Maryland's borders not from undocumented workers, but from rodents.
Del. Pat McDonough, R-Baltimore, will at an afternoon news conference roll out his Rat Trafficking Act, which would bar the D.C. government “and any other entity from trafficking rats and other vermin into Maryland.”
McDonough’s move will come after a flurry of attacks against the District's Wildlife Protection Act of 2010, which mandates that animal control companies use humane methods when handling animals. Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli set off the firestorm when he publicly worried that the law would lead to a mass relocation by exterminators of D.C. rats into his state.
The law, though, exempts most rodents from its purview and allows companies to pursue four options with animals they've trapped, including relocation — but only with the property owner's permission — and euthanasia.
In an advisory announcing his plans, McDonough slammed the Wildlife Protection Act.
“This insane law obviously places Maryland and Virginia at risk for an invasion of out-of-state rodents,” the release said. “We must protect our borders.”
Even a temporary flow of rats into Maryland, McDonough warned, could have enduring consequences.
“The rats multiply at astronomical rates and the rodents who have crossed the border into Maryland must be made illegal because they can produce large numbers of anchor babies,” McDonough’s release said.
REPORTED
|
OCCUPY PARTY
|
TEA PARTY
|
ARRESTS
|
4149+
|
0
|
DEATHS
|
7
|
0
|
RAPES
|
12
|
0
|
ARSON DAMAGE
|
$10,000,000.00
|
$0
|
PUBLIC DEFECATION
|
YES
|
NO
|
ANTISEMITIC RANTS
|
12
|
0
|
COST TO TAXPAYERS (11/9)
|
$19,327,487..00+
|
$0
|
PUBLIC MASTURBATION
|
3
|
0
|
MOLOTOV TAILS THROWN
|
10
|
0
|
FIGHTS STARTED
|
YES
|
NO
|
CHILDREN EXPLOITED
|
YES
|
NO
|
POLICE CARS DAMAGED
|
2
|
0
|
PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS
|
YES
|
NO
|
DRUG POSSESSION ARREST
|
YES
|
NO
|
CONCEALED WEAPON ARREST
|
YES
|
NO
|
DRUG OVERDOSE
|
YES
|
NO
|
THEFTS
|
YES
|
NO
|
BURGLARIES
|
YES
|
NO
|
VANDALISM ARREST
|
YES
|
NO
|
TRESPASSING ARREST
|
YES
|
NO
|
NON FATAL SHOOTINGS
|
1
|
0
|
PUBLIC URINATION
|
YES
|
NO
|
URINATION ON OTHERS
|
YES
|
NO
|
ISRAELI FLAGS BURNED
|
2
|
0
|
AMERICAN FLAGS BURNED
|
10
|
0
|
AMERICAN FLAGS DANCED ON
|
1
|
0
|
AMERICAN FLAGS DESECRATION
|
25
|
0
|
FELONY ASSAULT ON AN EMT
|
1
|
0
|
HEAD/BODY LICE OUTBREAKS
|
12
|
0
|
TUBERCULOSIS OUTBREAKS
|
1
|
0
|
MURDER
|
1
|
0
|
SUICIDE
|
1
|
0
|
SHOTS FIRED AT WHITE HOUSE
|
1
|
0
|
SCABIES OUTBREAKS
|
1
|
0
|
OBAMA ENDORSED
|
YES
|
NO
|
PELOSI ENDORSED
|
YES
|
NO
|
CAIR ENDORSED
|
YES
|
NO
|
SOCIALIST PARTY ENDORSED
|
YES
|
NO
|
NAZI PARTY ENDORSED
|
YES
|
NO
|
MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ENDORSED
|
YES
|
NO
|
COMMUNIST PARTY ENDORSED
|
YES
|
NO
|
BIDEN ENDORSED
|
YES
|
NO
|
HUGO CHAVEZ ENDORSED
|
YES
|
NO
|
BLACK PANTHERS ENDORSED
|
YES
|
NO
|
HEZBOLLAH ENDORSED
|
YES
|
NO
|
MARXIST UNION ENDORSED
|
YES
|
NO
|
9/11 TRUTHER ENDORSED
|
YES
|
NO
|
BOLSHEVIK ENDORSED
|
YES
|
NO
|
IRAN GOVERNMENT ENDORSED
|
YES
|
NO
|
AYATOLLAH ENDORSED
|
YES
|
NO
|
NORTH KOREA ENDORSED
|
YES
|
NO
|
FARRAKHAN ENDORSED
|
YES
|
NO
|
NATION OF ISLAM ENDORSED
|
YES
|
NO
|
Oh yes, I see the similarities now……..
The cops in Brownsville, TX kill a 15yr old dumb kid holding a pellet gun.
An 18yr. old woman kills an intruder with a shot gun, great thing to do, no question, but for God's sake enough already.
Why ITF are they not covering the murdered by police kid with a pellet gun at school????????????? P.S. He was shot 3X. Unions, that is the difference, think about it.
From an e-mail : Please read
All Hail King Barack the First
Creating any form of a democratic form of government is tough and America's Founders had it tougher than most. One must remember that what they were attempting to do hadn't ever been done before, they were essentially making it up as they went along. But one thing they were very clear about: they had no interest in being ruled by a King or any other type of autocrat. If anything, they went out of their way in ensuring that such a thing would never happen in this nation, crafting a document that was very clear and specific regarding the equal division of powers among three equal branches of government (one of which was further divided in two) and clearly specifying exactly what each branch could, and more importantly, could not do.
Historians have often argued that our first autocratic President was Abraham Lincoln, who took extraordinary measures during a time of great crisis to ensure the overall survival of the Union itself, with little regard to the potential long-term consequences of some of his decisions. However, it took another 40 years or so for Presidents to decide that they had the power to rule over the land, using their own personalities to point our nation in the direction in which they believed it should go. Theodore Roosevelt, who was soon followed by Woodrow Wilson, were both Progressives, in the sense that they believed government was a powerful force for good and should be used to correct the wrongs that they witnessed. It could literally be argued that those two men radically altered the look of the nation, bringing in a host of new laws and ideas that still impact our lives today.
Roughly a century after Theodore Roosevelt left office, another charismatic young man seeks to re-shape the country based on his own ideas, backed up with the power of his own rhetoric. That man is Barack Obama, former Illinois state legislator and professional agitator who seems little bothered with the restrictions put into place by the very Constitution he claims to have once taught. Need powerful agency directors whom you don't want to be bothered by Congressional oversight? No problem, just about a couple of dozen "Czars" who can implement your desired changes free from Congressional authorization. Union backers facing the prospect of seeing their companies go under after years of union-led abuse? No problem, let's just buy those companies outright, then fudge the books in such a manner as to make it appear as if these were profitable deals. The list is as endless as the one containing his campaign promises.
This leads us to His majesty's latest outrage: the direct appointment of Richard Cordray as head of a newly-created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. One moment while we leaf through the Constitution searching for the clause giving the Executive Branch the power to create such an agency...
The Cordray appointment is controversial in two regards:
First, his appointment was already blocked by the Senate, using the power exclusively granted to that segment of the Legislative Branch. Obama is blatantly circumventing the authority which is expressly granted to the Senate alone. The Executive Branch does not possess the Constitutional authority to make such appointments without consent, see Article Two, Section Two. One would think a former professor of Constitutional law might be aware of this fact.
Secondly, a so-called "recess appointment" can only be made after the Senate has been out of session for at least 10 days, while the Senate is actually still in what is known as a "pro-forma" session, which the Senate website defines as:
pro forma session - A brief meeting (sometimes only several seconds) of the Senate in which no business is conducted. It is held usually to satisfy the constitutional obligation that neither chamber can adjourn for more than three days without the consent of the other.
In other words, the Senate is still technically in session, which should negate the ability of the Executive Branch to make appointments which can only be made when Congress is in recess.
What this all boils down to is this: a vain, self-absorbed man who rose to the highest office in our nation entirely on his ability to publish allegedly ghost-written memoirs and speak beautifully while reading a teleprompter, is attempting to consolidate as much power as possible in his own hands, Constitution be <snip>ed. This president often reads flowery speeches from his teleprompter which talk about supporting Americans who "play by the rules" and "do what's right". In other words, playing by the rules is only for the little guy, not for His Majesty, King Barack the First.
The way the fascists and commies do it. You think it was bad before it has gotten worse. From the Washington Times. by Stephen Dinan and Susan Crabtree.
President Obama used his recess appointment powers Wednesday to name a head for the controversial Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and three new members to the National Labor Relations Board — moves Republican lawmakers said amounted to an unconstitutional power grab.
The president acted just a day after the Senate held a session — breaking with at least three different precedents that said the Senate must be in recess for at least three days for the president to exercise his appointment power. Mr. Obama himself was part of two of those precedents, both during his time in the Senate and again in 2010 when one of his administration’s top constitutional lawyers made the argument for the three-day waiting period to the Supreme Court.
Mr. Obama tapped former Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray to head the CFPB, and named three others to the labor board — all of which had been stymied by congressional Republicans who said Mr. Obama is accruing too much power to himself through those two agencies.
In strikingly sharp language, Republicans said the Senate considers itself still in session for the express purpose of blocking recess appointments, and the move threatened to become a declaration of war against Congress.
“Although the Senate is not in recess, President Obama, in an unprecedented move, has arrogantly circumvented the American people,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican.
GOP House Speaker John A. Boehner called the move “an extraordinary and entirely unprecedented power grab by President Obama that defies centuries of practice and the legal advice of his own Justice Department.”
“The precedent that would be set by this cavalier action would have a devastating effect on the checks and balances that are enshrined in our Constitution,” the Ohio Republican said in a statement.
The White House, though, argues Republican senators have been stonewalling his nominees for so long that Mr. Obama had no choice but to circumvent them.
The president introduced Mr. Cordray during a trip to Ohio Wednesday, telling a supportive crowd that the Senate Republicans’ ongoing blockade of his nomination “inexcusable.”
“I refuse to take ‘No’ for an answer. I’ve said before that I will continue to look for every opportunity to work with Congress to move this country forward. But when Congress refuses to act in a way that hurts our economy and puts people at risk, I have an obligation as president to do what I can without them,” Mr. Obama said.
CPFB supporters has said the lack of a top executive has blocked the fledgling agency from taking on a number of tasks in its mandate to police the financial sector and protect consumers from fraud. Mr. Cordray was accompanying the president on the trip, and briefly spoke to reporters.
He said he would begin work immediately, adding: “We’re going to begin working to expand our program to non-banks, which is an area we haven’t been able to touch until now.”
The Constitution gives the president the power to make appointments when the Senate is not in session and able to confirm them. Traditionally, that has been understood to mean when the Senate has adjourned for a recess longer than 10 days, and a Clinton administration legal opinion said a recess must be at least three days.
Mr. Obama’s own top constitutional lawyers affirmed that view in 2010 in another case involving recess appointments. Asked what the standard was for making recess appointments, then-Deputy Solicitor General Neal Katyal told the justices the administration agreed with the three-day rule.
“The recess appointment power can work in a recess. I think our office has opined the recess has to be longer than 3 days,” Mr. Katyal said
Alan Colmes is a full blown piece of $h1t. Your typical liberal f'ing douche bag I've had it.
If you QP'd before, will you buy the same amount of QP's? Stop Qp'in? Start Pikin' em? $2 $4 $8 $16 $32 $64 etc. no biggie???
May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007