This and That

Whatever this and that is for the day

Saturday, January 28, 2012

 

The GOP has learned well from the opposition

Spot on article.

http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150516734848435


Comments:
She makes some interesting points.
The GOP Establishment will self-destruct before ever giving in to the tea party, though, and will spin a loss to being the fault of stubborn voters rather than their own stubbornness.

Remember: Tea Party = Good. Whiskey Rebellion = Bad
Forget: They were *both* about taxation. ;-)
I disagree with Sarah Palin on this. I have no idea why she sees Gingrich as a conservative and Romney as a moderate. If anything, Romney has been consistent with his principles, and Newt is all over the map.

Newt was FOR government mandated healthcare, before he recently turned against it. In fact, he was advocating for mandatory health care before just about anyone else. WAY before Romney became governor of Massachusetts.

You want a much BETTER article about Newt, written by one of the freshman Republicans serving with Newt? Check here:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0112/72084.html

Unfortunately, Sarah Palin is doing the exact thing that she is railing against. She is taking a bunch of thinly-veiled shots against Romney, while blindly supporting Newt Gingrich -- who has earned her support HOW exactly?

I like Sarah Palin, but she's way off course here. A lot of the commenters on her Facebook post are saying the same thing.
@time*treat - The Tea Party movement is 100% about the financial health of the country. It specifically avoids anything regarding social issues, religion, abortion, national defense, or any other issue.

So, from a Tea Party perspective, who is the best candidate? You can't seriously think that Gingrich fits the bill for Tea Party folks. On what basis?

Romney, on the other hand, is NOT a Washington insider -- he only served in office for four years. Most of his experience has been building his business from the ground floor, investing in other business and building other businesses from the ground-up (like Staples), and rescuing the Winter Olympics games.

Of all the Republican candidates, he is the ONLY one with the kind of financial and business experience to fix the problems of this country comprehensively and correctly.

Sorry, but Ron Paul's approach of slash and burn is not going to work either. First of all, it would never win approval in the Congress (you know, the ones who pass the budget and write the checks). Second of all, it is quite possible that there would be major unintended consequences of what he is proposing -- so bad that he will get kicked out in four years, and will have ended up wrecking things as badly as Obama did.

I would say that Santorum has the second-best chance of fixing the economy, because at least he wants to tackle one of the key problems in this country -- the manufacturing sector.

Gingrich is a total Washington insider, and a big progressive new-world-order guy. He is no way a Tea Party guy, nor should Sarah Palin be suggesting he is one. If anything, Newt despises the Tea Party because it takes power away from Washington. Newt is a Washington insider, so that is where he wants the power to remain.

Don't get me wrong. If Newt somehow wins the nomination I will grudgingly support him over Obama, because he may make the country marginally better than it is today. Obama will certainly continue making it worse.
@Todd: I *personally* don't consider Newt a good choice, but I didn't vote in SC. The Tea Partiers there expressed a different view.

From Palin's article - "Newt is an imperfect vessel for Tea Party support, but in South Carolina the Tea Party chose to get behind him instead of the old guard’s choice."


Yes, I read it carefully, and I did read that sentence.

Romney is the choice for many people of the Tea Party, so I don't know where Sarah Palin gets this "old guard" thing. The "establishment" argument is a red herring.

By her saying that New is an "imperfect vessel for Tea Party support", she is saying in effect that Newt IS A VESSEL FOR TEA PARTY SUPPORT, even if he is flawed.

And that's why I said NO, he is NOT a vessel for Tea Party support. He is the antithesis of that. If anything, ROMNEY is the vessel for Tea Party support, because he is the only one who is an outsider with deep financial and business experience.
Post a Comment

<< Home

Archives

March 2019   February 2019   January 2019   December 2018   November 2018   October 2018   September 2018   August 2018   July 2018   June 2018   May 2018   April 2018   March 2018   February 2018   January 2018   December 2017   November 2017   October 2017   September 2017   August 2017   July 2017   June 2017   May 2017   April 2017   March 2017   February 2017   January 2017   December 2016   November 2016   October 2016   September 2016   August 2016   July 2016   April 2016   February 2016   January 2016   December 2015   November 2015   October 2015   July 2015   June 2015   May 2015   March 2015   January 2015   December 2014   November 2014   October 2014   September 2014   August 2014   July 2014   June 2014   May 2014   April 2014   March 2014   February 2014   January 2014   December 2013   November 2013   October 2013   September 2013   August 2013   July 2013   June 2013   May 2013   April 2013   March 2013   February 2013   January 2013   December 2012   November 2012   October 2012   September 2012   August 2012   July 2012   June 2012   May 2012   April 2012   March 2012   February 2012   January 2012   December 2011   November 2011   October 2011   September 2011   August 2011   July 2011   June 2011   May 2011   April 2011   March 2011   February 2011   January 2011   December 2010   November 2010   October 2010   September 2010   August 2010   July 2010   June 2010   May 2010   April 2010   March 2010   February 2010   January 2010   December 2009   November 2009   October 2009   September 2009   August 2009   July 2009   June 2009   May 2009   April 2009   March 2009   January 2009   December 2008   November 2008   October 2008   September 2008   August 2008   July 2008   June 2008   May 2008   April 2008   March 2008   February 2008   January 2008   December 2007   November 2007   October 2007   September 2007   July 2007   June 2007   May 2007   April 2007   March 2007   February 2007   January 2007   December 2006   November 2006   October 2006   September 2006   August 2006   July 2006   June 2006   May 2006   April 2006   March 2006   February 2006   January 2006   December 2005   November 2005   October 2005   September 2005   August 2005   July 2005   June 2005   May 2005   April 2005   March 2005   February 2005   January 2005   December 2004   November 2004   October 2004   September 2004   August 2004   July 2004   June 2004   May 2004  

Powered by Lottery PostSyndicated RSS FeedSubscribe