Hillary Clinton Wants Increased Censorship and Control Over U.S. Social Media Platforms
First, we need background context.
The latter part of 2010 through 2011 was a key period in the Obama presidency. On the cusp of a midterm election shellacking, with domestic focus on the issues around Obamacare, the Obama team and Hillary Clinton team were also intent on fueling the “Arab Spring” and the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in Libya and Egypt.
With background research provided by the U.S. State Dept and Rivkin Project in France, a petri-dish dish experiment to see if French culture could be diluted and enhanced with “brotherhood-style” multiculturalism, Hillary and Barry then fine-tuned the mechanics. Secretary Hillary Clinton, Samantha Power and Susan Rice quickly convinced President Obama to help leverage his Silicon Valley allies.
As a workaround to stop Hosni Mubarak and Muamar Kaddafi from controlling information flow and putting down the protests, the social media platforms of Twitter and Facebook were enlisted to assist the Brotherhood in Egypt and Libya respectively. The U.S-designated Brotherhood partners were given support, communication and influence through Twitter and Facebook to organize their protests.
In 2011 the official merge of U.S. social media platforms to assist the U.S. State Dept foreign policy agenda was created. In many ways this merge was the inflection point for government to begin controlling social media, Libya and Egypt were the BETA test for what would later be deployed domestically.
Seeing the success and influence of the Arab Spring experiment, in 2012 President Obama signed HR-5736, with an addition to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013. The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act, contained within the NDAA for Fiscal Year 2013, eased some restrictions so that media produced by the U.S. Agency for Global Media and intended for foreign audiences could be distributed domestically upon request, according to its text. Prior to its passage, the propaganda content was banned from being disseminated in America.
This move made it possible to deploy the same social media tactics domestically. Within the Twitter Files, you will note how 2012 and 2013 are key periods when the Dept of Homeland Security began exploring their new influence partnership in social media. For the next ten years, that partnership created various sub-set silos within the government.
DHS, FBI and Intelligence Community offices now had direct communication lines into Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Google, WhatsAp, etc. However, Telegram and TikTok were not around and not part of the partnership. What two platforms have been targeted recently?… Just a coincidence, I’m sure.
The Arab Spring was the BETA test, the proving ground. Then they went domestic with the same operation.
The results of the domestic operation, the public-private partnership, later became stunningly visible in the COVID-19 censorship operation as well as the government influence operation in the aftermath of the 2020 election. However, most recently there has been some pushback from both originating entities; Twitter – via Elon Musk, and Facebook – via a regretful Mark Zuckerberg.
Remember, Hillary Clinton was the Secretary of State when this entire system was originating.
This is the fullest context to absorb the video soundbite below. Hillary Clinton is upset that control over social media platforms is slipping away. Hillary Clinton now saying, ‘we lose total control’ if we don’t ‘Moderate & Monitor’ social media more. WATCH:
.
Hillary Clinton is frustrated because from her perspective so much progress had been made.
Now, suddenly, with increased scrutiny and a more awakened public seeing the consequences, it is harder for the government to execute their domestic propaganda operations. Even the labeling and categorization through “mis-dis-mal-information” does not appear to be working.
Within the recent WEF discussion, Secretary Kerry outlines how freedom of speech is a ‘threat to the global democracy‘ because the governing officials have a difficult time controlling information. Kerry goes on to posit how the next administration, presumably in his hope Kamala Harris, will forcefully structure all the tools of government to stop Americans from using the first amendment to freely speak about issues.
Governing is too challenging, according to Kerry, when the government cannot stop people from seeking and discovering information that is against their interests. Effective governing required compliant adherence to a singular ideology. Against the backdrop of COVID-19 and a host of similarly related government narratives, if people are free to find alternative information and think for themselves, they become increasingly more difficult to control. Yes, this is said quite openly. This is the mindset of those in power. WATCH:
.
On a positive note, millions of people now accurately understand why it is so important to refute the terms “mis-dis-mal information.” When CTH initially warned about the labeling, most people did not understand; however, as the consequences begin to surface, I would argue almost a majority of people now understand.
…”There is no such thing as “disinformation” or “misinformation”. There is only information you accept and information you do not accept. You were not born with a requirement to believe everything you are told; rather, you were born with a brain that allows you to process the information you receive and make independent decisions.”…
The absence of control creates fear.
BREAKING: Wisconsin Team Challenges 11% of Milwaukee Addresses – DNC Quickly Intervenes, Wants Ballots Sent to These Dubious Locations
____________________________________________________
The Mary McCord Discussion Enhances So Many Questions About DOJ Targeting of President Trump
A recent soundbite shared on the Twitter platform aligns with so many aspects about how the IC targets their enemies, and how the DOJ National Security Division (DOJ-NSD) then weaponizes the opportunities provided by the U.S intelligence apparatus.
Notice in this short video how Mary McCord positions the power structure of the DOJ-NSD silo in deference to the Intelligence Community (IC). This is a critical path within the next step to American’s “great awakening.” In the past we have outlined how the DOJ-NSD weaponizes their Lawfare by using “National Security Information,” or what the insiders call “NSI.”
As an outcome of the way our checks and balances have been modified against our interests, the judicial branch has repeatedly deferred to the DOJ around the issue of “national security.” In fact, if the DOJ labels any Lawfare approach as a national security matter the subsequent evidence therein, the NSI (even when not seen) is accepted by the judicial branch without question. The judicial branch defers to the executive on all matters defined by the executive as “national security.”
This is the area of exploit being discussed by Mary McCord in this segment. However, notice there is one apparatus that can supercede the DOJ-NSD’s ability to weaponize Nat Sec Information, that’s the power of the intelligence apparatus. WATCH:
McCord notes how she and Andrew Weissmann navigate through the process of using NSI as they move toward their target; the most common reference is their political opposition, Donald J Trump.
If there is one Lawfare operative who has escaped scrutiny for her corrupt endeavors, it would be Mary McCord. More than any other Lawfare operative within Main Justice, Mary McCord sits at the center of every table in the manufacturing of cases against Donald Trump. {GO DEEP} Mary McCord’s husband is Sheldon Snook; he was the right hand to the legal counsel of Chief Justice John Roberts when the Dobbs decision was leaked.
When the Carter Page FISA application was originally assembled by the FBI and DOJ, there was initial hesitancy from within the DOJ National Security Division (DOJ-NSD) about submitting the application, because it did not have enough citations in evidence (the infamous ‘Woods File’). That’s why the Steele Dossier ultimately became important. It was the Steele Dossier that provided the push, the legal cover needed for the DOJ-NSD to submit the application for a Title-1 surveillance warrant against the campaign of Donald J. Trump.
When the application was finally assembled for submission to the FISA court, the head of the DOJ-NSD was John Carlin. Carlin quit working for the DOJ-NSD in late September 2016 just before the final application was submitted (October 21,2016). John Carlin was replaced by Deputy Asst. Attorney General, Mary McCord.
♦ When the FISA application was finally submitted (approved by Sally Yates and James Comey), it was Mary McCord who did the actual process of filing the application and gaining the Title-1 surveillance warrant.
A few months later, February 2017, with Donald Trump now in office as President, it was Mary McCord who went with Deputy AG Sally Yates to the White House to confront White House legal counsel Don McGahn over the Michael Flynn interview with FBI agents. The surveillance of Flynn’s calls was presumably done under the auspices and legal authority of the FISA application Mary McCord previously was in charge of submitting.
♦ At the time the Carter Page application was filed (October 21, 2016), Mary McCord’s chief legal counsel inside the office was a DOJ-NSD lawyer named Michael Atkinson. In his role as the legal counsel for the DOJ-NSD, it was Atkinson’s job to review and audit all FISA applications submitted from inside the DOJ. Essentially, Atkinson was the DOJ internal compliance officer in charge of making sure all FISA applications were correctly assembled and documented.
♦ When the anonymous CIA whistleblower complaint was filed against President Trump for the issues of the Ukraine call with President Zelensky, the Intelligence Community Inspector General had to change the rules for the complaint to allow an anonymous submission. Prior to this change, all intelligence whistleblowers had to put their name on the complaint. It was this 2019 IGIC who changed the rules. Who was the Intelligence Community Inspector General? Michael Atkinson.
When ICIG Michael Atkinson turned over the newly authorized anonymous whistleblower complaint to the joint House Intelligence and Judiciary Committee (Schiff and Nadler chairs), who did Michael Atkinson give the complaint to? Mary McCord.
Yes, after she left main justice, Mary McCord took the job of working for Chairman Jerry Nadler and Chairman Adam Schiff as the chief legal advisor inside the investigation that led to the construction of articles of impeachment. As a consequence, Mary McCord received the newly permitted anonymous whistleblower complaint from her old office colleague Michael Atkinson.
♦ During his investigation of the Carter Page application, Inspector General Michael Horowitz discovered an intentional lie inside the Carter Page FISA application (directly related to the ‘Woods File’), which his team eventually tracked to FBI counterintelligence division lawyer, Kevin Clinesmith. Eventually Clinesmith was criminally charged with fabricating evidence (changed wording on an email) in order to intentionally falsify the underlying evidence in the FISA submission.
When John Durham took the Clinesmith indictment to court, the judge in the case was James Boasberg.
♦ In addition to being a DC criminal judge, James Boasberg is also a FISA court judge who signed-off on one of the renewals for the FISA application that was submitted using fraudulent evidence fabricated by Kevin Clinesmith. In essence, now the presiding judge over the FISA court, Boasberg was the FISC judge who was tricked by Clinesmith, and now the criminal court judge in charge of determining Clinesmith’s legal outcome. Judge Boasberg eventually sentenced Clinesmith to 6 months probation.
As an outcome of continued FISA application fraud and wrongdoing by the FBI, in their exploitation of searches of the NSA database, Presiding FISC Judge James Boasberg appointed an amici curiae advisor to the court who would monitor the DOJ-NSD submissions and ongoing FBI activities.
Who did James Boasberg select as a FISA court amicus? Mary McCord.
♦ SUMMARY: Mary McCord submitted the original false FISA application to the court using the demonstrably false Dossier. Mary McCord participated in the framing of Michael Flynn. Mary McCord worked with ICIG Michael Atkinson to create a fraudulent whistleblower complaint against President Trump; and Mary McCord used that manipulated complaint to assemble articles of impeachment on behalf of the joint House Intel and Judiciary Committee. Mary McCord then took up a defensive position inside the FISA court to protect the DOJ and FBI from sunlight upon all the aforementioned corrupt activity.
You can clearly see how Mary McCord would be a person of interest if anyone was going to start digging into corruption internally within the FBI, DOJ or DOJ-NSD.
What happened next….
November 3, 2021 – In Washington DC – “Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) and the House Jan. 6 Select Committee has tapped Mary McCord, who once ran the Justice Department’s National Security Division, for representation in its fight to obtain former President Donald Trump’s White House records. (read more)
That’s the context; now I want to go back a little.
First, when did Mary McCord become “amicus” to the FISA court? ANSWER: When the court (Boasberg) discovered IG Michael Horowitz was investigating the fraudulent FISA application. In essence, the FISA Court appointed the person who submitted the fraudulent filing, to advise on any ramifications from the fraudulent filing. See how that works?
Now, let’s go deeper….
When Mary McCord went to the White House with Sally Yates to talk to white house counsel Don McGhan about the Flynn call with Russian Ambassador Kislyak, and the subsequent CBS interview with VP Pence, where Pence’s denial of any wrongdoing took place, the background narrative in the attack against Flynn was the Logan Act.
The construct of the Logan Act narrative was pure Lawfare, and DAG Sally Yates with Acting NSD AAG Mary McCord were the architects.
Why was the DOJ National Security Division concerned with a conflict between what Pence said on CBS and what Flynn said about his conversations with Kislyak?
This is where a big mental reset is needed. Flynn did nothing wrong. The incoming National Security Advisor can say anything he wants with the Russian ambassador, short of giving away classified details of any national security issue. In December of 2016, if Michael Flynn wanted to say Obama was an a**hole, and the Trump administration disagreed with everything he ever did, the incoming NSA was free to do so. There was simply nothing wrong with that conversation – regardless of content.
So, why were McCord and Yates so determined to make an issue in media and in confrontation with the White House? Why did the DOJ-NSD even care? This is the part that people overlooked when the media narrative was driving the news cycle. People got too stuck in the weeds and didn’t ask the right questions.
Some entity, we discover later was the FBI counterintelligence division, was monitoring Flynn’s calls. They transcribed a copy of the call between Flynn and Kislyak, and that became known as the “Flynn Cuts” as described within internal documents, and later statements.
After the Flynn/Kislyak conversation was leaked to the media, Obama asked ODNI Clapper how that call got leaked. Clapper went to the FBI on 1/4/17 and asked FBI Director James Comey. Comey gave Clapper a copy of the Flynn Cuts which Clapper then took back to the White House to explain to Obama.
Obama’s White House counsel went bananas, because Clapper had just walked directly into the Oval Office with proof the Obama administration was monitoring the incoming National Security Advisor.
Obama’s plausible deniability of the Trump surveillance was lost as soon as Clapper walked in with the written transcript.
That was the motive for the 1/5/17 Susan Rice memo, and the reason for Obama to emphasize “buy the book” three times.
It wasn’t that Obama didn’t know already; the problem was that a document trail now existed (likely a CYA from Comey) that took away Obama’s plausible deniability of knowledge.
The January 5th meeting documented by Susan Rice was quickly organized to mitigate this issue.
Knowing the Flynn Cuts were created simultaneously with the phone call, and knowing how it was quickly decided to use the Logan Act as a narrative against Flynn and Trump, we can be very sure both McCord and Yates had read that transcript before they went to the White House. [Again, this is the entire purpose of them going to the White House to confront McGhan with their manufactured concerns.]
So, when it comes to ‘who leaked’ the reality of the Flynn/Kislyak call to the media, the entire predicate for the Logan Act violation – in hindsight – I would bet a donut it was Mary McCord.
But wait, there’s more….
Now we go back to McCord’s husband, Sheldon Snook.
Sheldon was working for the counsel to John Roberts. The counsel to the Chief Justice has one job, to review the legal implications of issues before the court and advise Justice John Roberts. The counsel to the Chief Justice knows everything happening in the court and is the sounding board for any legal issues impacting the Supreme Court.
In his position as the right hand of the counsel to the chief justice, Sheldon Snook would know everything happening inside the court.
At the time, there was nothing bigger inside the court than the Alito opinion known as the Dobb’s Decision – the returning of abortion law to the states. Without any doubt, the counsel to Chief Justice Roberts would have that decision at the forefront of his advice and counsel. By extension, this puts the actual written Alito opinion in the orbit of Sheldon Snook.
After the Supreme Court launched a heavily publicized internal investigation into the leaking of the Dobbs decision (Alito opinion), something interesting happened. Sheldon Snook left his position. If you look at the timing of the leak, the investigation and the Sheldon Snook exit, the circumstantial evidence looms large.
Of course, given the extremely high stakes, the institutional crisis with the public discovering the office of the legal counsel to the Chief Justice likely leaked the decision, such an outcome would be catastrophic for the institutional credibility. In essence, it would be Robert’s office who leaked the opinion to the media.
If you were Chief Justice John Roberts and desperately needed to protect the integrity of the court, making sure such a thermonuclear discovery was never identified would be paramount. Under the auspices of motive, Sheldon Snook would exit quietly. Which is exactly what happened.
The timeline holds the key.
Remember the stories of the J6 investigative staff all going to work for Jack Smith on the investigation of Donald Trump? Well, Mary McCord was a member of that team [citation]; all indications are that her background efforts continue today as a quiet member of the Special Counsel team that is still attacking Donald Trump.
To give you an idea of the scope of influence of Mary McCord as a key functionary, consider what we can document.
♦ McCord submitted the fraudulent FISA application to spy on Trump campaign.
♦ McCord created the “Logan Act” claim used against Michael Flynn and then went with Sally Yates to confront the White House.
♦ McCord then left the DOJ and went to work for Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler.
♦ McCord organized the CIA rule changes with Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson.
♦ McCord led and organized the impeachment effort, in the background, using the evidence she helped create.
♦ McCord joined the FISA Court to protect against DOJ IG Michael Horowitz newly gained NSD oversight and FISA review.
♦ McCord joined the J6 Committee helping to create all the lawfare angles they deployed.
♦ McCord then coordinated with DA Fani Willis in Georgia.
♦ McCord is working with Special Counsel Jack Smith to prosecute Trump.
In short, Mary McCord is the lawfare string that winds through every legal ‘stop Trump’ effort, and her primary partner in this endeavor is Andrew Weissmann. In this next video segment, notice what the “how to use that” quote is referencing.
.
It’s not Jack Smith per se’, any more than it was Robert Mueller.
Jack Smith and Robert Mueller are/were simply the front men of the Lawfare band.
Post
Conversation
Seems to be a lot going on with rescue reports not being reported in news outlets.
Seeing a lot of citizen reports that something weird is going on.
Hall bath and hall project.
Started on Aug 11 and just finished Oct 2nd. Project dragged on and on due to my severe arthritis in hips and legs and also have hip joint problems. A lot of step ladder work even though I only had to go up two steps at the most.
Will be the last major project I do. Maybe.
Anyhow I
Removed popcorn on ceilings
done drywall repair on hall ceiling . Removed strip about 8 feet long and 2 feet wide where there was a leak at one time or another. The roof line above has an apron that extends up above the main roof because of a front porch that extends out.The leak never showed through the ceiling except for a crack in the ceiling about 2 feet long where drywall was butted together and taped and mudded.
Done drwall mudding on outside edges of ceilings as they only applied the joint tape set in mud and never second coated it knowing they were going to use popcorn.
done mudding here and there on walls fixing blemishes and popped nails. Just take a hammer and tap the popped nail back in and mud it.
Washed the walls,
Painted ceilings and walls,
done final punchout on painting.
Yesterday I took up the floor protection and swept and mopped the floor.
Today I will change the air filter again.
Glad that project is done.
Next project which should not take very long is replace the hall toilet with a handicapped toilet.
Another major reason I do not want to do anymore major work is a couple weeks ago I found out the boundaries of a road expansion project behind my house. The proposed boudary goes right through the center of my house.
Will no doubt be bought out by imminent domain when plans are finalized on boundaries. A year or a little longer from now.
And I just had the roof shingles replaced last year by a roofing contractor which cost the going rate for new shingle replacement.
So any work from this point will be p!ssing money down the drain.
Fell as a double combo.
Wed, Oct 2, 2024 7-8-7-3
Output
Wheel Combinations: 24
Excluded with Options: 76
*************************
Looks like we need the 3 ball to drop.
Chose the 37 pair
Iran launches missiles at Israel.
This <snip> never ends.
3 Ball droped
46 pair returns from last draw
Tue, Oct 1, 2024 6-4-5-3
*******************************************
See how this works out in the next four weeks.
Past Year (Sep 24, 2023 - present)
676 drawings in date range specified
Box combinations not drawn during the date range specified
(or filtered out):
0136, 0137, 0146, 0159, 0235, 0238, 0256, 0346, 0348,
0458, 0468, 0567, 0578, 1234, 1236, 1246, 1247, 1267,
1268, 1269, 1279, 1378, 1457, 1459, 1569, 1679, 2345,
2347, 2357, 2359, 2367, 2379, 2568, 3678, 3689, 3789,
4569, 4578, 4589
I added these from last drawn wihin past year but being furthest out. I used Oct 2023 as cutoff point.
Combo Times Drawn Expected Last Seen Draws Since
2489 1 1.62 Sep 25, 2023 673
0249 1 1.62 Oct 3, 2023 658
1358 1 1.62 Oct 6, 2023 652
0489 1 1.62 Oct 12, 2023 642
0128 1 1.62 Oct 13, 2023 639
0356 1 1.62 Oct 15, 2023 636
1368 1 1.62 Oct 18, 2023 631
3456 1 1.62 Oct 19, 2023 629
1789 1 1.62 Oct 20, 2023 627
0469 1 1.62 Oct 22, 2023 623
Looks like we need the 3 ball to drop.
Chose the 37 pair
Picking 0137 & 2379 combos
Pair Times Drawn Last Seen Draws Since
88 28 Aug 14, 2024 88
99 26 Aug 27, 2024 63
55 28 Sep 9, 2024 40
77 34 Sep 16, 2024 26
17 63 Sep 18, 2024 22
67 74 Sep 18, 2024 22
78 70 Sep 19, 2024 21
66 37 Sep 20, 2024 19
05 63 Sep 20, 2024 18
47 75 Sep 20, 2024 18
35 61 Sep 21, 2024 17
56 55 Sep 21, 2024 17
37 71 Sep 21, 2024 16
22 43 Sep 23, 2024 13
33 38 Sep 24, 2024 12
34 63 Sep 24, 2024 12
68 65 Sep 24, 2024 11
00 33 Sep 25, 2024 9
03 70 Sep 25, 2024 9
02 78 Sep 26, 2024 8
07 78 Sep 26, 2024 8
09 71 Sep 26, 2024 8
13 66 Sep 26, 2024 7
19 57 Sep 26, 2024 7
38 66 Sep 26, 2024 7
23 63 Sep 27, 2024 6
26 64 Sep 27, 2024 6
36 62 Sep 27, 2024 6
39 72 Sep 27, 2024 6
69 59 Sep 27, 2024 6
11 38 Sep 27, 2024 5
12 69 Sep 27, 2024 5
25 66 Sep 28, 2024 4
27 66 Sep 28, 2024 4
57 63 Sep 28, 2024 4
59 54 Sep 28, 2024 4
79 74 Sep 28, 2024 4
08 70 Sep 28, 2024 3
44 33 Sep 28, 2024 3
15 69 Sep 29, 2024 2
18 80 Sep 29, 2024 2
45 57 Sep 29, 2024 2
58 68 Sep 29, 2024 2
24 63 Sep 30, 2024 1
28 74 Sep 30, 2024 1
29 70 Sep 30, 2024 1
48 55 Sep 30, 2024 1
49 60 Sep 30, 2024 1
89 70 Sep 30, 2024 1
01 75 Sep 30, 2024 0
04 66 Sep 30, 2024 0
06 74 Sep 30, 2024 0
14 61 Sep 30, 2024 0
16 69 Sep 30, 2024 0
46 59 Sep 30, 2024 0
Looks like a workable system to cut down on the no match combinations which contains 210 no match combos.
Mon, Sep 30, 2024 8-9-4-2 0-1-4-6
Sun, Sep 29, 2024 8-4-5-1
Sat, Sep 28, 2024 9-2-5-7 8-0-4-4
Fri, Sep 27, 2024 2-6-9-3 1-2-1-5
Thu, Sep 26, 2024 9-0-2-7 1-3-9-8
Wed, Sep 25, 2024 6-4-0-9 3-0-1-0
Tue, Sep 24, 2024 3-3-4-3 6-1-8-9
Mon, Sep 23, 2024 3-4-1-3 1-3-2-2
___________________________________________
Monday, September 23, 2024
No match combinations.
No match has appeared 180 times in past 6 months.
ABCD | 180 | 53.4% |
No match has appeared 353 times in past 12 months.
ABCD 353 52.2%
See how this works out in the next four weeks.
Past Year (Sep 24, 2023 - present)
676 drawings in date range specified
Box combinations not drawn during the date range specified
(or filtered out):
0136, 0137, 0146, 0159, 0235, 0238, 0256, 0346, 0348,
0458, 0468, 0567, 0578, 1234, 1236, 1246, 1247, 1267,
1268, 1269, 1279, 1378, 1457, 1459, 1569, 1679, 2345,
2347, 2357, 2359, 2367, 2379, 2568, 3678, 3689, 3789,
4569, 4578, 4589
I added these from last drawn wihin past year but being furthest out. I used Oct 2023 as cutoff point.
Combo Times Drawn Expected Last Seen Draws Since
2489 1 1.62 Sep 25, 2023 673
0249 1 1.62 Oct 3, 2023 658
1358 1 1.62 Oct 6, 2023 652
0489 1 1.62 Oct 12, 2023 642
0128 1 1.62 Oct 13, 2023 639
0356 1 1.62 Oct 15, 2023 636
1368 1 1.62 Oct 18, 2023 631
3456 1 1.62 Oct 19, 2023 629
1789 1 1.62 Oct 20, 2023 627
0469 1 1.62 Oct 22, 2023 623
Mon, Sep 30, 2024 8-9-4-2
I was playing 9842 10 days ago
I was looking for the 24 pr today
Game | Draw Date | Predictions |
---|---|---|
Pick 4 Midday | Mon, Sep 30, 2024 | 5402, 5412, 5432, 6402, 6412, 6432, 8402, 8412, 8432 |
October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 April 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 March 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004