Tuesday, June 15. 2010
Posted by Karl Denninger in Oil The World at 18:18
SourceThe Market Ticker
"Ehhhh... BP A Zero?
"Probably not, but that's not the problem.
Let's run the numbers. The Government just said that the amount beingejected from the well is somewhere between 35,000 and 60,000 bbls per day.
Now let's look at the numbers, and analyze this strictly on that basis.
The minimum fine is $1,000/bbl spilled. But if negligence can be shown,the fine can be as high as $4,300/bbl.
This is strictly for the fine for spilling the oil,and excludes other considerations (damages, cleanup costs, potential criminalliability and of course whatever civil liability juries come at them with forall sorts of litigation.)
At $4,300/bbl we're looking at a fine of $150 - $258 million per day, andafter today's hearings it is probably reasonable to assume that BP will gettagged for "negligence" (at best.)
We're 50-some days into this; that works out to somewhere between $7.5 and$13 billion in fines alone thus far. If we presumethey can shut the well down in the middle of August, we're looking at another 50days (roughly) before that happens, leaving the totalfines in the neighborhood of $15-25 billion.
The company, like most multi-nationals, is partitioned. That is, BP is aconglomerate with legal and financial firewalls (physical ones) betweensubsidiaries.
The total value of their US-based assets is estimated somewhere around $90billion. On a 12-month trailing basis they have produced $265 billion inrevenue with an EBIDTA of $38.8 billion and a net income attributed to commonshares of $20 billion - globally.
Taken that way, and expecting complex litigation around any fine and otherlitigation, the payout time would be expressed in years, not months. As suchat first blush the fines and other exposure doesn'tlook like it will be enough - even under an adverse scenario - to zero thecompany.
BUT - will BP let things go that far and contaminatetheir global earnings with this claim?
More to the point, why should they?
Leave the morals/ethics out of this - this is, and will remain, a businessdecision.
Were I sitting in the White House contemplating my speech this evening Iwouldn't be so <snip>sure that I can bludgeon the company into submission.
There is real danger here for the Obama administration. If it appears thatthe fines and litigation losses will come within reasonable reach of their USassets they may well be better off to draw down the curtain and place the USsubsidiary into Chapter 11 - then let the creditors - including litigants -fight it out for the scraps in a restructuring. They come out with a good partof the liability (perhaps all or most of the fines!) discharged, and voila!
Want to bet they aren't thinking about it?
Oh yes they are. They've hired Goldman and Blackrock, and I don't care whatthey claim - you don't go hiring folks like that for a cakewalk. They've donethis analysis too and they're well-aware of the option - one that there isabsolutely nothing that the Obama Administration cando to prevent.
Congress and President Obama have a political Kobyashi Maru here.
MMS is 100% responsible for approvingthe well casing changes made on the rig - changes that, were they notapproved, would have likely prevented the blowout in the first place.
But MMS is the Obama Administration and thosechanges were approved just days before the blast. And while BP selected thedesign and implementation they used, they didn't do it in a vacuum - they did sowith the full permission of the government's so-called "regulators."
Oops.
President Obama doesn't want to discuss this, of course. Did you notice thelack of an MMS representative at the hearings today? Guess why? Yep. Startasking about those permits and the rubber stamp at the MMS office, and you'regoing to get a lot of stuttering in response.
BP's chief executive said in the hearing today that he has no intention ofestablishing an escrow account, and frankly, I don't blame him. I also wouldn'tlet a third party adjudicate claims - other than a court, should someone want tosue. That's how it works in this country; being brow-beaten byCongress and Obama sounds good, and I believe BP is culpable for and will beforced to pay huge damage claims and fines - but nonetheless theyare entitled to due process of law, as is everyone.
I wouldn't touch this stock - except as a daytrade orhighly speculative play. With a dividend yield today ofclose to 10% and with all the litigation and fine risk there is certainly apossibility of a dividend cut - or elimination - in the future. With about 40%of its assets in the United States, the firm would be severely-damaged if it cutloose the US subsidiary and walked off.
But calls for debarment of the firm from leases it holds simply expropriatethe assets that the US wants BP to use to pay these claims. The higher the riskof that outcome, the more intriguing erecting the middle finger in the directionof President Obama becomes. And with the firm's stock trading with a current10% dividend, shedding 40% of the assets and literally walking off on theliabilities as those assets dwindle in value starts looking better andbetter.
Careful Barack.
You may get what you ask for, but it may not be what you actuallywant."
http://market-ticker.org/archives/2409-Ehhhh...-BP-A-Zero.html
May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 January 2013 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 March 2011 January 2011 December 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 March 2005 November 2004 October 2004