You Decide

Always decide for yourself whether anything posted in my blog has any information you choose to keep.

Monday, January 7, 2008

 

"Br-r-r! Where did global warming go?

Seems AlGore and his old time control 'n fleece them with fear religion is being exposed.  Poor thing couldn't pull off distortions, sensationalism and outright misrepresentatons of fact like Michael Moore managed to sell the gullible.  Big Grin

Embedded links.


"Br-r-r! Where did global warming go?

By Jeff Jacoby
Globe Columnist / January 6, 2008

THE STARK headline appeared just over a year ago. "2007 to be 'warmest on record,' " BBC News reported on Jan. 4, 2007. Citing experts in the British government's Meteorological Office, the story announced that "the world is likely to experience the warmest year on record in 2007," surpassing the all-time high reached in 1998.

But a funny thing happened on the way to the planetary hot flash: Much of the planet grew bitterly cold.

In South America, for example, the start of winter last year was one of the coldest ever observed. According to Eugenio Hackbart, chief meteorologist of the MetSul Weather Center in Brazil, "a brutal cold wave brought record low temperatures, widespread frost, snow, and major energy disruption." In Buenos Aires, it snowed for the first time in 89 years, while in Peru the cold was so intense that hundreds of people died and the government declared a state of emergency in 14 of the country's 24 provinces. In August, Chile's agriculture minister lamented "the toughest winter we have seen in the past 50 years," which caused losses of at least $200 million in destroyed crops and livestock.

Latin Americans weren't the only ones shivering.

University of Oklahoma geophysicist David Deming, a specialist in temperature and heat flow, notes in the Washington Times that "unexpected bitter cold swept the entire Southern Hemisphere in 2007." Johannesburg experienced its first significant snowfall in a quarter-century. Australia had its coldest ever June. New Zealand's vineyards lost much of their 2007 harvest when spring temperatures dropped to record lows.

Closer to home, 44.5 inches of snow fell in New Hampshire last month, breaking the previous record of 43 inches, set in 1876. And the Canadian government is forecasting the coldest winter in 15 years.

Now all of these may be short-lived weather anomalies, mere blips in the path of the global climatic warming that Al Gore and a host of alarmists proclaim the deadliest threat we face. But what if the frigid conditions that have caused so much distress in recent months signal an impending era of global cooling?

"Stock up on fur coats and felt boots!" advises Oleg Sorokhtin, a fellow of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences and senior scientist at Moscow's Shirshov Institute of Oceanography. "The latest data . . . say that earth has passed the peak of its warmer period, and a fairly cold spell will set in quite soon, by 2012."

Sorokhtin dismisses the conventional global warming theory that greenhouse gases, especially human-emitted carbon dioxide, is causing the earth to grow hotter. Like a number of other scientists, he points to solar activity - sunspots and solar flares, which wax and wane over time - as having the greatest effect on climate.

"Carbon dioxide is not to blame for global climate change," Sorokhtin writes in an essay for Novosti. "Solar activity is many times more powerful than the energy produced by the whole of humankind." In a recent paper for the Danish National Space Center, physicists Henrik Svensmark and Eigil Friis-Christensen concur: "The sun . . . appears to be the main forcing agent in global climate change," they write.

Given the number of worldwide cold events, it is no surprise that 2007 didn't turn out to be the warmest ever. In fact, 2007's global temperature was essentially the same as that in 2006 - and 2005, and 2004, and every year back to 2001. The record set in 1998 has not been surpassed. For nearly a decade now, there has been no global warming. Even though atmospheric carbon dioxide continues to accumulate - it's up about 4 percent since 1998 - the global mean temperature has remained flat. That raises some obvious questions about the theory that CO2 is the cause of climate change.

Yet so relentlessly has the alarmist scenario been hyped, and so disdainfully have dissenting views been dismissed, that millions of people assume Gore must be right when he insists: "The debate in the scientific community is over."

But it isn't. Just last month, more than 100 scientists signed a strongly worded open letter pointing out that climate change is a well-known natural phenomenon, and that adapting to it is far more sensible than attempting to prevent it. Because slashing carbon dioxide emissions means retarding economic development, they warned, "the current UN approach of CO2 reduction is likely to increase human suffering from future climate change rather than to decrease it."

Climate science isn't a religion, and those who dispute its leading theory are not heretics. Much remains to be learned about how and why climate changes, and there is neither virtue nor wisdom in an emotional rush to counter global warming - especially if what's coming is a global Big Chill. "

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/01/06/br_r_r_where_did_global_warming_go/ 


Comments:
I think it went to Pluto, I heard that it's getting warmer over there. And to think of it Mars was also getting warmer. HMMMMM No jets and SUVs on either of those planets.....lol
Yep none of either but plenty of solar winds from a warmer burning sun. Thanks Pac!
Yes Konane....It's the sun's cycles which have been going on for billions of years. Why certain people can't see that we've had ice ages and warming ages many times over, naturally, is beyond my understanding.
What really boggles my mind is how people in high places who are advocates of the warming know what they have to do to fix this ficticious problem. In their case, they talk about green cars, and other silly options, but I can't be fooled. They know that they would have to force the few on the very high to reveal a source of energy which has to do with gravity and the such. They can't because they're in cahoots in one way or another, either through lobby money or other sources.
As long as power, greed, and money are combined, this planet and the people living on it will never heal itself and flourish.

I think of it as the epitamy of all the grants for stupid studies done by weirdo individuals. These people get money every year for showing how cow emmissions affect the atmosphere. What's next, a grant on how bad breath in the atmosphere cause lung irritation? Pork spending is thru the roof.

I'd be more impressed if they sought after the UFO technology that certain officials are keeping secret from society. And then exposed everyone in both parties.....lol That day will never happen...Atleast in my lifetime.
Mega money to be made, people to be controlled what more can a losing presidential candidate want??
I saw a very interseting show. I think it was on the history channel, maybe...

They were talking about glaciers moving through Manhattan, N.Y.C. The documentary pointed out certain rocks in central park had grooves on them. They said it was from mile high glaciers, with the enormous weights making the grooves. And then showed grooves that were coupled with the recession of the glaciers.
I did not know that, and I grew up there...lol
I should've pointed out that the rocks I was talking about were10 to 15 feet long.
Hubby saw a program on PBS about weather changes found in the earth layers, rocks, etc., which pointed to past cyclical changes you're talking about.

Just read something metaphysical which said that when we were in a deep ice age which your comments probably address, it's when Lemurians which was a very highly advanced society lived on earth on large islands in the Pacific now covered by water from those melted glaciers.

So much not discovered, so much fact purposefully ignored by greenhouse gas global warming absolutists. Power and money grab, period.
Post a Comment

<< Home

Archives

September 2021   August 2021   July 2021   June 2021   May 2021   April 2021   March 2021   February 2021   January 2021   December 2020   November 2020   October 2020   September 2020   August 2020   July 2020   June 2020   May 2020   April 2020   March 2020   February 2020   January 2020   December 2019   November 2019   October 2019   September 2019   August 2019   July 2019   June 2019   May 2019   April 2019   March 2019   February 2019   January 2019   December 2018   November 2018   October 2018   September 2018   August 2018   July 2018   June 2018   May 2018   April 2018   March 2018   February 2018   January 2018   December 2017   November 2017   October 2017   September 2017   August 2017   July 2017   June 2017   May 2017   April 2017   March 2017   February 2017   January 2017   December 2016   November 2016   January 2013   October 2011   September 2011   August 2011   July 2011   June 2011   May 2011   March 2011   January 2011   December 2010   October 2010   September 2010   August 2010   July 2010   June 2010   May 2010   April 2010   March 2010   February 2010   January 2010   December 2009   November 2009   October 2009   September 2009   August 2009   July 2009   June 2009   May 2009   April 2009   March 2009   February 2009   January 2009   December 2008   November 2008   October 2008   September 2008   August 2008   July 2008   June 2008   May 2008   April 2008   March 2008   February 2008   January 2008   December 2007   November 2007   October 2007   April 2007   March 2007   February 2007   January 2007   December 2006   November 2006   October 2006   September 2006   August 2006   July 2006   June 2006   May 2006   April 2006   March 2006   February 2006   January 2006   December 2005   November 2005   October 2005   September 2005   August 2005   July 2005   June 2005   March 2005   November 2004   October 2004  

Powered by Lottery PostSyndicated RSS FeedSubscribe