maddogs hideaway

Welcome to Maddogs hideaway, The poormans predictor. Somedays I just feel like ridin...!

Name: MADDOG10
Location: Beautiful Florida
Country: United States
Interests: restoring old cars, winning the lottery, avid football fan, and riding my motorcycles... Both (Harleys)...!!

Thursday, February 28, 2013

Obamas false alarms.!

Obama's false alarms

Andrew Napolitano: Sequesters' silver lining is they 'will  force the president to prioritize'

Published: 14 hours ago

author-imageby Andrew  Napolitano Email  | Archive
Andrew P. Napolitano, a  former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is the senior judicial analyst  at Fox News Channel. Judge Napolitano has written eight books on the U.S.  Constitution. The most recent are "The  Freedom Answer Book" and "Theodore  and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom." To find out more about Judge Napolitano and to read features by other Creators  Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit www.creators.com.More ↓Less ↑ 
 

In an effort to remove the hot-potato issue of excessive government spending  from the 2012 presidential campaign, and calling the bluff of congressional  Republicans who always seem to favor domestic spending cuts but increased  military spending, President Obama suggested the concept of “sequester” in late  2011.

His idea was to reduce the rate of increased spending by 2 percent across the  board – on domestic and military spending. To his surprise, the Republicans went  along with this. They did so either because they lacked the political fortitude  and the political will to designate specifically the unconstitutional and  pork-barrel federal spending projects to be cut, or because they thought that  with the debt of the federal government then approaching $15 trillion (it is now  $16.6 trillion and growing), any reductions in spending money the government  doesn’t have are preferred to no reductions. So, instead of enacting a budget,  and instead of recognizing that much of its spending is simply not authorized by  the Constitution, Congress enacted the so-called sequester legislation, and the  president signed it into law.

 
The reductions the sequesters require are reductions in the rate of increased  spending from those originally planned by Obama and authorized by Congress.  Since the federal government has not had a budget in four years, even though  federal law requires it to have one every year, these are planned expenditures,  not budgetary items, on which the president wants to spend more money. Congress  does not feel bound to obey the laws it has written; hence it has disregarded  the legal requirement of a budget. Without a budget, the president has great  leeway as to how to allocate funds within each department of the executive  branch of the federal government.

Nevertheless, even if these sequesters do kick in, the feds will spend  more in 2013 than they spent in 2012. That’s because the sequesters are not  cuts to spending; rather, they are reductions in planned increases in spending.  The reductions amount to about 2 cents for every planned dollar of increased  spending for every federal department.

Judge  Neapolitan’s brand new book explains how the government is taking your  constitutional freedoms and how you can fight back: “The Freedom Answer  Book”

The question remains: What part of each federal department (Justice, Defense,  Homeland Security, Agriculture, etc.) will suffer these reduced increases? Here  is where this sequester experiment gets dicey.

The president – who once championed the idea of sequesters and even  threatened to veto any congressional effort to dismantle them – now has decided  he can’t live without that additional 2 percent to spend. So, he has gone about  the country trying to scare the daylights out of people: Prisoners will be  released from federal prisons, soldiers won’t have enough bullets in their  weapons, we will need to endure five-hour waiting lines at the airports, Social  Security checks will be late, and similar nonsense.

If the fears Obama predicts do come to pass, we will have only him to blame.  Remember, the sequesters only cut planned increases in spending. Suppose the  president planned to hire 100 more soldiers for the Army and agents for the TSA  and air traffic controllers for the FAA. Is the president required to hire only  98 of them? Well, under the law, he has a choice. He can hire all 100 and cut  back elsewhere, or he can make do on 98 percent of what he has determined are  the government’s additional needs. But he cannot just intentionally release  prisoners or weaken the military or inflict maddening delays on the flying  public in order to make his fearful warnings come to pass.

His job is to uphold the Constitution, to make the executive branch of the  federal government work. The president has taken an oath to “faithfully execute”  his office. The words of the oath are prescribed in the Constitution. The word  “faithfully” requires him to enforce the laws whether or not he agrees with  them. It also requires him to enforce the laws in such a manner that they make  sense – so that the federal government basically performs the services we have  grown to expect of it.

I know, we have grown to expect more of the federal government than the  founders dreamed, and far more than we can possibly pay for and infinitely more  than the Constitution authorizes. But that’s the good thing about these  sequesters: They will force the president to prioritize.

If he prioritizes so that we stay free and safe, so that the government does  what we basically have paid it to do, he’ll be doing his job and saving us a  tiny bit of cash. But if the president enforces the laws so that they hurt  rather than work well just so he can say “I told you so” rather than “I’ll work  with you,” then he will be inviting his own political misery or even his own  impeachment. And we will have sunk deeper into the abyss of fear, division and  red ink that already engulfs us.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/obamas-false-alarms/#tYDJoQGTFJAcP63t.99

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Out of touch with reality...

Republicans should let the sequester proceed if President Obama won’t let the  defense cuts be eased, and Obama is simply out of touch with reality on fiscal  matters, according to former U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint, S.C.

DeMint resigned his seat in January as he prepares to become the new  president of the Heritage Foundation. In a wide-ranging interview, DeMint  addressed looming debates on guns and immigration, but he’s also passionate  about how the current sequestration fight plays out. DeMint told WND House GOP  members have responsibly approved changes in sequestration so the cuts won’t  land so hard on national security spending, and the ball is now in Obama’s  court.

“If we can’t get the president to come off the military cuts, we need to  leave these cuts in place,” DeMint said. “In most cases, it’s not really cuts.  It’s just a slowing of the growth of spending which has been out of control for  years. I would encourage Republicans, if the president’s not going to be  reasonable about restoring military funding and allowing these other programs to  actually be reduced, then they’re just going to have to swallow it. It’s a small  percent of our total budget and, frankly, we’re going to have to do a lot more  of these cuts if we’re going to balance the budget within 10 years.”

Obama has repeatedly demanded a “balanced” approach that consists of spending  cuts and higher taxes for the wealthy. The president also says he and Congress  have already made painful cuts of $2.5 trillion. DeMint said the president is  simply not living in the real world.

“The president has a difficult time with the truth. We have not cut any  spending in Washington. We’ve doubled spending in the last 10 years. He keeps  talking about ‘revenues,’ which is their new code word for more tax increases,”  said DeMint, citing the fiscal cliff deal and the Obamacare as major tax  increases that have already been implemented.

“We don’t have a revenue problem,” he said. “If we would cut spending, you  would see the private sector grow and even more revenues to the federal  government. The president talks about a fair and balanced approach. American  businesses and individuals now have some of the highest rates in the world. It’s  hard to compete internationally. He’s still talking about more tax increases.  The president is really going to hurt our country in a long-term way if we don’t  push back on this.”

The mounting debt makes fiscal responsibility essential, and DeMint said  America doesn’t have much time to change course.

“If we’re going to save our country and keep us from looking like Greece in a  few years, we’re going to have to find things we can cut,” he said, noting that  duplicative programs and services that should be under state control are a good  place to start.

“I think the president has lost contact with reality,” DeMint said. “He  doesn’t see the spending and the debt as a problem. We are approaching a real  meltdown if we don’t get control of it.”

The former senator also made news this week for his public defense of  freshman Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas. Democrats and some media outlets slammed Cruz  for his pointed criticism of defense secretary nominee Chuck Hagel and demanding  that Hagel reveal which groups hired him to speak and how much he was paid for  those appearances. Demint said the partisan double-standard should be condemned,  and Cruz should be commended for doing his job.

“What Ted Cruz is doing makes me so proud I could pop, because the pressure  against doing what he’s doing is really great,” said Demint, who notes that  liberals and the media demanded tax records from Mitt Romney going back a  decade.

“The questions that Ted Cruz asked were very reasonable and very thorough.  He’s tried cases before the Supreme Court. He knows how to get answers out of  people. I think he was doing just the right thing,” he said.

While DeMint has left the Senate, he plans to remain active in recruiting  solid conservative candidates to Senate races, a move he said will bring  heartburn to the establishment for both parties. DeMint rejects the assertion  from Karl Rove and others that the GOP has suffered from “unelectable”  conservatives winning primaries in winnable states.

“We haven’t been too conservative. Certainly, we have to have our candidates  better prepared for the shark pool that they’re going to get into because the  media’s always trying to ask questions that we don’t need to be answering  because they are not federal issues,” said DeMint, who suggests making a  campaign issue out of federalism and moving more and more responsibilities out  of Washington and back to the state level.

“We need to prove to these Washington establishment folks that the best way  to win races is to get a good conservative candidate,” he said. “We saw it in  (Marco) Rubio, Rand Paul, Pat Toomey, Mike Lee, Ted Cruz, Jeff Flake. They’re  out there. They can win, and we just need to identify them and support  them.”

Other pending debates also have DeMint’s attention. On guns, he said  exhaustive Heritage Foundation studies show that gun-control measures do not  work. He argued that this is another issue best handled at the local level.

“We can’t eliminate evil in this world, but the schools are going to have to  do things at the local and at the state level to protect themselves and have the  ability within to stop something like this once it happens,” DeMint said.  “Gun-control laws don’t help. If they did, Chicago wouldn’t be the murder  capital of the world. We need to look at real solutions and not just this  political talk that makes people feel better but doesn’t make our children  safer.”

Finally, on immigration, DeMint said this is another issue where the Obama  rhetoric sounds appealing to many but the real motivation is far less noble.

“It’s very apparent to me what’s going on here. The president and the  Democrats want two things. They want voters. They want union members. So  everything they talk about is about citizenship,” said DeMint, who warned that  the U.S. has an illegal immigration problem and not a citizenship problem.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/demint-obama-has-lost-contact-with-reality/#0QD4lGGGdC3WBDEz.99

Monday, February 25, 2013

Just look in the Mirror...!

Cartoon: Attention Everyone – OBAMA IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SEQUESTRATION

Sunday, February 24, 2013

Not Man Enough? Buy a Gun..

  •    

REAL AMERICA

Not man enough? Buy a gun

Exclusive: Patrice Lewis sets straight lefty columnist mocking  guys who own firearms

Published:  2 days ago
author-imageby Patrice  Lewis Email  | Archive
Patrice Lewis is a  freelance writer whose latest book is "The  Simplicity Primer: 365 Ideas for Making Life more Livable." She is  co-founder (with her husband) of a home woodcraft business. The Lewises live on  20 acres in north Idaho with their two homeschooled children, assorted  livestock, and a shop that overflows into the house with depressing regularity.   Visit her blog at www.rural-revolution.com.More ↓Less  ↑
  • Of all the ridiculous and underhanded tactics progressives are using to  convince Americans we don’t need firearms, once of the silliest is exemplified  in an opinion piece from CNN entitled, “Not  Man Enough? Buy a Gun.

The author of this piece, Paul Waldman (an extreme  progressive, needless to say), played on an ad from Bushmaster to the tune  of “Consider your Man Card Reissued” if you purchase one of their rifles.

 
Mr. Waldman apparently did not pick up on the notion that the Bushmaster ad  was a joke. But neither did he consider whether the ad had merit:  namely, Real Men own guns.

The implication is that men who take an interest in firearms are compensating  for something they lack. “As we begin a long-overdue examination of where gun  culture in America has gone,” writes Mr. Waldman, “we can’t avoid the way guns  have become so entwined with masculine anxiety, as so many men seek to find  their identity in instruments of destruction.”

I don’t know where Mr. Waldman lives, but I live in the deeply rural  panhandle of north Idaho, sometimes called Redneckistan (that’s a joke, Mr. Waldman). Firearms of all shapes and sizes are as common as pickups. Around  here, even the progressives are armed. In fact, to find someone who  doesn’t own a gun is surprising, and usually elicits the question of  “Why not?” It’s also worth noting that invasive crimes such as home robberies  are notably lower here, because the bad guys know what will happen if they try  to force their way into someone’s house.

So to those of us in rural America, equating manhood and gun ownership is  comical in the extreme. Guns are merely tools, like hammers or chainsaws or  tractors. They are used to keep one’s person and property protected against  those who would violate it. And, like fine art or Elvis memorabilia, some people  like to collect firearms … not as “instruments of destruction,” but as useful  tools that have a variety of functions.

If someone wanted to break into Mr. Waldman’s home (which presumably contains  no firearms), he would have little recourse except to wring his hands and say,  “Oh, dearie me! Dearie me!” as he watched the intruders do whatever horrible  things they wanted – because let’s face it, without the possession of the right  tools, a man is virtually helpless. Fists are useless against firearms.

So why do men like guns?

Men are biologically programmed to be protectors, and protectors need the  proper tools. An armed man is the first line of defense for his wife, children  and home. But progressives view this attitude as retro, primitive and above all  unnecessary. Mr. Waldman has apparently forgotten what a man’s function is.

Mr. Waldman also linked the popularity of 1950s Western movies to male  anxiety. “For the post-war American male,” he writes, “an office job and a house  in the suburbs offered few opportunities to prove one’s manhood, so tales of  two-fisted cowboys wielding six-guns became irresistible.”

Um, Mr. Waldman, the 1950s male didn’t need to prove his  masculinity. He already had, by fighting a war against some of the  worst tyrants in history. Westerns weren’t popular because of six-guns; they  were popular because they depicted men doing what men do best: protecting. Using  the tools of their trade, heroes in Westerns fought the bad guys, defended  homes, protected women and came out ahead at the end. Y’know, the old concept of  “good vs. evil.” Yet progressives view this attitude as retro, primitive and  above all unnecessary.

“It’s not enough to have a hunting rifle over your mantle,” sneers Waldman.  “You need an entire arsenal, just in case the government falls, society  disintegrates and you have to protect your cave – sorry, your home – from the  marauding hordes.”

Let’s see – $16 trillion dollars in debt and rising, gangs roaming the  streets, flash mobs, the knockout game … yeah, obviously we’re a bunch of  deranged lunatics for thinking the government may fall and society is  disintegrating. As for defending our caves, you’re right. That IS our  intent.

But increased gun sales, Waldman implies, are solely because wimpy gullible  men are falling for the slimy sales tactics of gun manufacturers who goad buyers  into thinking they’ll become like John Wayne if only they’d buy a few more  rifles. But let me put it this way: Who’s more secure in his masculinity? The  man who buys the right tools for the job? Or the man who mocks others and wants  to take the tools away lest anyone threaten HIS masculinity?

Progressives are so intimidated by scary-looking guns that they can’t see  them for what they are: tools. Instead, they have to endow them with phallic  characteristics. But as the saying goes, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.  Sometimes an AR-15 is just an AR-15.

Mr. Waldman and others like him support a powerful government and, by  extension, powerless individuals. By mocking men who own guns, they  cleverly avoid the real reason men (and women) should possess firearms:  that an armed populace is capable of defending against a despotic  government.

Why do you think the men in 1776 personally owned weapons that were equal or  better than those of the British? Was it because they suffered from male anxiety  and were compensating for something? Or was it because they knew they had a job  to do? Because they had the right tools, we (the people) have  a United States. Unarmed men couldn’t have done the job.

People purchase tools commensurate with the job on hand. If you’re building a  house, you don’t use a plastic toy hammer. If you’re hunting deer, you don’t use  a rock. If you’re defending your home against a robbery, you don’t use a kitchen  knife. If you’re fighting a rapist, you don’t whistle. And if you’re defending  your country against an overbearing and tyrannical government, you don’t use  your fists. You use tools commensurate with the task.

So yes, men are “compensating” for something by buying and using Bushmasters:  They’re preparing to defend against an increasingly tyrannical government trying  to restrict the God-given freedoms of We the People.

That’s why men need guns: Because the government has  them.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/not-man-enough-buy-a-gun/#lf6liWZyJbdv0e4m.99

Saturday, February 23, 2013

This is for All the women at LP...

Friends, please visit our page and feel free to become a part of our meaningful and inspirational community ♥ @[270321286408419:274:Words To Inspire the Soul]♥Visit our FREE website : www.Daveswordsofwisdom.com for more fun, wisdom and inspiration ♥.

Saturday, February 23, 2013

This is telling it " Like It Is "...

Preserve gun rights, save black lives

Star Parker: Law-abiding urban Americans need more firearms, not fewer

Published: 11 hours ago

author-imageby Star  Parker Email  | Archive
                                      rss feed Subscribe to feed       

This past Friday my organization, CURE, sponsored a press conference at the  National Press Club in Washington to bring attention to the importance of  rigorously defending the right of all Americans, guaranteed under the Second  Amendment of our Constitution, to own a gun.

Our event provided a forum for black leaders from the world of politics and  public policy in Washington, from the business community, from academia and from  the clergy to express their deep concern about efforts currently under way to  limit our God-given and constitutional individual right of self-defense.

Why would an organization like CURE, whose mission focuses on the relevance  of American values of faith and freedom to minorities, be so concerned about  guns?

Because, as conservative black Americans, we know that the soul of America is  kept alive with the free flow of the oxygen of freedom.  And we know that when  that flow is interrupted in any way, the group that suffers first and most are  blacks.

New gun-control initiatives coming from our president and from Democrats in  Congress to respond to a highly publicized tragedy by wanting to expand the  power of government and limit the freedom of citizens comes as no surprise.

There is no problem facing America today that liberals do not believe should  be solved by more government and less freedom.  And liberals are consistent and  predictable in their indifference to facts and experience that show whenever  they do succeed in growing government and limiting freedom, they make matters  worse, not better.

A substantial body of research already shows that gun controls empower  criminals and weaken law-abiding citizens.

As John Lott, former chief economist of the U.S. Sentencing Commission,  recently wrote in the Wall Street Journal, “With just a single exception, the  attack in Tucson last year, every public shooting in the U.S. in which three or  more people have been killed since at least 1950 have occurred in a place where  people are not allowed to carry their own firearms.”

Regarding black reality, blacks are the least armed, least protected and  defended, and the most assaulted citizens in our country.

According to a recent Pew Research Center survey, 42 percent of whites and 16  percent of blacks say that they have a pistol or rifle at home.

And, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, for the period 1980 to  2008, “Blacks were six times more likely than whites to be homicide victims and  eight times more likely to commit a homicide.”

Law-abiding black citizens live under siege in crime-ridden urban centers.   Somehow they are supposed to buy the logic that giving more power to those in  law enforcement already charged with maintaining order but don’t, while  stripping down the freedoms of those that do obey the law, will make them better  off?

In a Pew Research Center survey in 2009, 46 percent of whites compared to 24  percent of blacks said they have a “great deal” of confidence in the local  police to enforce the law.

Can anyone whom God has blessed with a brain actually think that universal  background checks will keep guns out of the hands of gang thugs?  Or that these  same checks, in which some past legal infraction might nullify a gun  application, will not result in even fewer urban law-abiding blacks obtaining a  weapon for protection?

Perhaps even worse than another make-pretend big-government “answer” that  will not only not solve a problem, but will make it worse, gun-control  initiatives mask over the issues that really need attention: a culture that  devalues personal responsibility, that fosters government dependence, that  trashes traditional understanding of sex, marriage and family and that bans  these traditional values from our public schools and our public life.

Americans of all backgrounds must fight yet another misguided liberal attempt  to undermine our personal freedom and sap the vitality of our nation.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/preserve-gun-rights-save-black-lives/#PP8RILQrSs699R3Z.99

Friday, February 22, 2013

Path to Citizenship...

Path to Citizenship

Thursday, February 21, 2013

The CURE for all your Ailments...

Cartoon: Obamacare – It’s only like 20 grand per family. Bargain, right?

Thursday, February 21, 2013

This is how it will be done...

HOME OF THE BRAVE

How to shut down a tyrant

Exclusive: Bradlee Dean has strategy to persuade youth of  America's greatness

Published:  2 hours ago
author-imageby Bradlee  Dean Email        
Bradlee Dean, an exclusive  WND-TV video contributor, is an ordained preacher, heavy  metal drummer, talk-show host of the Sons  of Liberty Radio, and speaks on college and high school campuses with his  ministry, You Can Run But You  Cannot Hide International. He also is the producer of the 5-DVD documentary  "My  War." Bradlee is currently involved with a lawsuit  against MSNBC and Rachel Maddow and could use all the prayers and financial  support possible. Tax-deductible donations to help restore this generation back  to America's biblical foundation can  be made online. Follow Bradlee on  Facebook.More ↓Less ↑

“Posterity! You will never know how much it cost the present generation to  preserve your freedom! I hope you will make good use of it. If you do not, I  shall repent in Heaven that I ever took half the pains to preserve it.”

– John Adams

 
There has been great concern about how Tyrant Barack Hussein Obama has been  out there attempting to win the hearts and minds of our young through his  twisted and un-American ideologies.

Synonyms for a tyrant are oppressor, dictator, bully, despot, persecutor. 

How fitting.

After performing constitutional lyceums in 341 high schools across America, I  have seen firsthand the indoctrination being imposed on the future generations  of this great country – which, for the most part, they are rejecting.

I recently returned from a tea-party speaking tour in Florida, and the No. 1  concern these patriots brought up to me was how to reach the next generation. 

Finally, they were asking the right questions to bring our country back in  the right direction.

The answer is all too simple: Show them the price of freedom.

When performing my high  school assemblies, I will ask the students in the assembly how many know  their Constitution.

Many begin to laugh in sheer ignorance.

I tell them that if they do not know their rights, they don’t have any  rights.

I then ask them how many have grandparents, uncles, aunts, cousins, dads and  moms –  maybe even brothers and sisters – who have fought, bled, or died to  ratify and magnify the Constitution they do not even know.

About 85 percent of them do, and it hits home with the students.

All of a sudden it is no longer funny.

After seeing the price of freedom, the entire room is immediately captivated  with a new love and respect for America and the laws of our constitutional  republic.

They will also no longer tolerate anyone – especially tyrants – who would  attempt to desecrate those who made the ultimate  sacrifice.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/how-to-shut-down-a-tyrant/#KoZJi2edFBu7TvG9.99

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

And the LIES keep adding up.!

     
Barry Farber is a pioneer  in talk radio, first beginning his broadcast in 1960. "The  Barry Farber Show" is heard weeknights 8 to 9 p.m. Eastern time. An  accomplished author, Farber's latest book is "<snip>tails  with Molotov: An Odyssey of Unlikely Detours."More  ↓Less ↑
  • There are bookies in London who will take your bets on who will be the next  pope.  As long as they’re such sports, will they make book on this: Is there  anything President Obama can do or say that will pierce his magic shield and  turn American mass media reverence into rage?

Obama is the most incredible player American politics has ever met.  He  insults Israel, and gets almost 80 percent of the Jewish vote twice!  He  insults the U.K., returning a bust of Churchill to the British Embassy, and pays  not one political penny in penalty.  Solyndra wastes billions in taxpayer  dollars plus the drowning of green dreams in wide-awake red ink, and like screen  slapstick, the more pies he takes squarely in the face the more they like  him.

 Remember the fury aimed at late columnist Bill Safire when he called Hillary  Clinton a “congenital liar”?  How would deeply missed Mr. Safire describe a  president who stands up and tells young people his is absolutely the most  transparent administration in history at the very moment Sen. Lindsay Graham  succeeds in belaying Chuck Hagel’s defense secretary nomination until the  president tells us where he was last Sept. 11, the night of the Benghazi horror?  Obama won’t tell us.  The FBI refuses to let Congress or the media interview or  even learn the whereabouts of the Benghazi survivors.  And media life goes on,  congressional life goes on, American life goes on unperturbed by this confluence  of outrages that would sink any normal president.

It doesn’t stop.  It doesn’t even slow down.  Bill Ayers, not merely  self-confessed, but self-proclaimed leader of the terrorist Weather  Underground, walks, works and politics as a free man thanks to one of those  great American legal “technicalities.”  Aware that such an unpatriotic and  sordid association might lose him votes, Obama barely admitted knowing Ayers  when he first ran in 2008.  He called Ayers “just a guy in the neighborhood.”   We now know Obama’s political career was launched in Bill Ayers’ living room,  and Ayers and Obama’s political activities were intertwined like long-lost  lizards.  Chicago community life goes on.  American life goes on.  And two words  go on to sum up this gargantuan living lie – “ho” and “hum.”

Media consensus prior to the last election held that foreign policy was  Obama’s “strong suit.” Really?  Stick a gun to my head and warn me I’ve got 15  seconds to name an Obama foreign policy success; the best I could come up with  is, “He kept us out of Sri Lanka.” Remember the “reset” with Russia?  Last week  Russian nuclear-armed bombers were buzzing Guam (American territory, in case you  attended public school)!

Obama declared war on coal.  Did any ship’s captain ever declare war on life  preservers?  Coal – given today’s economy, environment, the whole mix – is a  combustible we should fall to our knees and be thankful for.  The late Adolf  Hitler, without a single oil well in hand, “gasified” coal to fuel his vast war  machine.  And that was with the technology of the 1930s!  Anti-coal greenies  insist they’re going to have the last laugh.  They’ve yet to score their first  chuckle.

The lies, broken promises and failures of President Barack Obama make ancient  presidential sins, like too many too expensive vacations, almost not worth  mentioning.  Those still shocked by the multi-million dollar Hawaiian idylls  etc. need to get their shockers adjusted.  You’re getting shocked by the wrong  things.

Preschool education was one of the greatest joys of my life as a parent.  At  home!  Please explain what Obama means by “universal preschool” at the age of 4.  In a well-run American family, such “separation” of child from parents at that  age is child abuse.

Yet, through it all, it looks as if the only one losing patience with Obama  is Michelle.  We’ll leave the “separate vacation” rumors to the  gossip-ologists.  Could Michelle possibly have her own wonderments about  where Obama was the night of Sept. 11?

And, on our way out, yes, let’s mention the almost $17 trillion debt!  We may not cure poverty, but under Obama’s leadership we’ll sure-as-hell cure  wealth!

Meanwhile, the media live, like bacteria, neatly folded into Obama’s back  pocket.  There is no Obama failure they will not ignore, no excess they will not  applaud.  This is like a rabbi concealing his ownership in a pig ranch.  It’s  not supposed to work this way.

You could feed a hundred hungry horses on the accumulation of what a normal  American in a normal America would consider the “last straw.” So, will Obama  ever feel public wrath for anything mentioned here, or not mentioned here?

Thomas Jefferson, who may well one day edge out even George Washington as our  major national hero, believed so deeply in media correcting leaders gone awry,  like Obama, that he once said, “If I had to choose between a government with no  newspapers (that was media at the time!) or newspapers with no government, I  should surely choose the latter.”

Thank you, Tom.  Media is supposed to rectify, not ratify, our Obamas.

Those icy particles falling everywhere now are not snowflakes.

They’re Thomas Jefferson’s tears.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/bho-and-his-magic-shield/#F4CIjaMjTkepAfZT.99

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

The 2nd will not be HIS power grab...!

byLarry  Klayman Email  | Archive
                                      rss feed Subscribe to feed       
Larry Klayman is a former  Justice Department prosecutor and the founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom  Watch. His latest book is "Whores:  Why and How I Came to Fight the Establishment."More ↓Less ↑ 
  •        

In the last few weeks WND has published three articles, all of which are  verifiable from independent investigation and fact checking, that unmask Supreme  Leader Barack Hussein Obama’s plan to use force to extend his increasingly  dictatorial power and take over the United States. Sound farfetched or just the  usual paranoia the left likes to ascribe to us on the right? Hardly, given  Obama’s executive actions designed to pave the way for an ultimate gun ban and  his State of the Union address just this week – which revealed more about his  vision and plans to “communize” the United States by grossly increasing the size  and role of “his” anti-white, pro-radical Muslim, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic,  pro-gay and lesbian, pro-feminist, atheist, pro-illegal immigrant and socialist  government and eliminate what few liberties and freedoms we have left.

It is ironic indeed that just as one socialist dictator, Hugo Chavez of  Venezuela, is about to expire of terminal cancer on his deathbed in a Cuban  hospital, another one, who is much more powerful, is seeking to extend his  control in a Stalinist “gulag style” power grab. Unlike Chavez and his  also-dying buddy, Cuban communist strongman Fidel Castro, our fraudulently  elected ineligible president is not just some two-bit dictator-terrorist of a  Third World country; he is the so-called leader of the free world – an oxymoron  if there ever was one since the “mullah in chief’s” apparent plans are to  eliminate individual freedoms and instead install a “Big Brother” regime  domestically and worldwide through his comrades at the United Nations and their  Agenda 21.

 
Here is a synthesis of what WND reported about Obama’s plans to wage a  counter-revolution against We the People; as he knows that it is only a matter  of a short time that his Stalinist power grab will force law-abiding,  God-fearing citizens to rise up in  revolution as our Founding Fathers “found”  themselves compelled to do against a far less malevolent monarch, King George  III, in 1776.

Aaron Klein, a top-notch investigative reporter  for WND, revealed that “with almost no media coverage, the White House last  week announced its new Interagency Working Group to Counter Online  Radicalization to Violence that will target not only Islamic terrorists but  so-called violent ‘sovereign citizens.’ … The FBI defines ‘sovereign citizens’ …  as ‘anti-government extremists who believe that even though they may physically  reside in this country, they are separate and apart or ‘sovereign’ from the  United States.”

Klein goes on to report: “The law enforcement agency noted that such citizens  believe that they don’t have to answer to any government authority, including  courts, taxing entities, motor vehicle departments or police. … The new online  working group will be chaired by the national security staff at the White House  with input from specialists in countering what the Obama administration calls  violent extremism. … Because of the troubling ideology (sic) of some Obama  officials, the question arises as to exactly which citizens are considered  threats by the (Obama) government.”

This Klein/WND assessment of what Obama and his comrades have in mind through  their sinister Interagency Working Group to Counter Online Radicalization is  historically ironic and telling. By the definition of radicals being proffered  by Obama’s FBI and Justice Department henchmen, George Washington, John Adams,  Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin and our other great Founding Fathers and  framers of the U.S. Constitution would be considered “radical anti-government  extremists” since they, beginning with the Declaration of Independence on July  4, 1776, refused, on behalf of the American colonies, to recognize the  sovereignty of the British crown when its government entities sought to over-tax  them, remove legal recourse in colonial courts and finally seize and destroy the  people’s guns.

Here is another reminder of what they wrote in that great document that  effectively declared war on the British crown: “… when a long train of abuses  and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce  them under absolute Despotism, it is their (the people’s) right, it is their  duty, to throw off such Government (i.e. sovereignty), and to provide new Guards  for their security.”

Claiming to have been a constitutional law professor during the earlier part  of his “career,” Obama knows this all too well. He knows that his vision of a  “new America,” when put into total practice as he is now doing after his  “re-election,” will ultimately send We the People into the streets and cause us  to reject his total tyrannical sovereignty over us. And that is why, coupled  with his Interagency Working Group to Counter Online Radicalization to Violence,  Obama and his evil cohorts in his administration are moving to kill any  revolution on our part.

This can be seen as well through the black-helicopter sorties now being flown  by Obama’s military flunkies in our urban neighborhoods, which  WND crack reporter Bob Unruh reported on.  The black helicopters in recent  weeks have been flying overhead in major American cities, such as Miami, Chicago  and Houston, firing practice rounds from government-issued machine guns. These  so-called exercises are said to prepare for urban violence, but from what  quarter? Terrorists, or Founding-Father-like American citizens who eventually  will rise up in revolt to Obama’s despotic rule?

And then there is the recent column by WND Editor Joseph Farah, which reveals  that the Obama-controlled government is stockpiling and hoarding guns as part of  a secret security force (“Why  is government stockpiling guns, ammo?”). Farah unmasks something he  predicted years ago and writes: “Many of you will remember a story I broke a  long time ago – about presidential candidate Barack Obama’s little-noticed  announcement that, if elected in 2008, he wanted to create a ‘civilian national  security force’ as big and as strong and as well funded at the Defense  Department.” It would now appear that this civilian national security force, in  conjunction with the other despotic measures discussed above, are his equivalent  of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard – a force that will put down any rebellion by  freedom-loving Americans if he deems it necessary.

In this context, we can understand even better Obama and company’s real  intention with regard to so-called gun control. He wants to do away with our  Second Amendment right to bear arms, just as King George III attempted to do  knowing full well that revolution was coming and on the near horizon. Like our  Founding Fathers, We the People will ultimately pledge our lives, our sacred  honor and what fortunes we have left under this so-called president, to fight  for and preserve our great nation.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/obama-prepares-to-kill-2nd-american-revolution/#K0cKlhsk7o97gk9Q.99

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

This man ows no apology, period...!

According to Cal Thomas, well-known nationally syndicated columnist, Dr.  Ben Carson owes President Obama an apology.

Carson spoke at the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, D.C., this past  week – a bipartisan annual event held since 1953, attended by members of  Congress and usually the president.

President and Mrs. Obama were present this year and Thomas feels that Dr.  Carson was out of line for including in his remarks comments about areas  considered public policy – our national debt, our tax system, our publics  schools and health care.

According to Thomas: “Our politics have become so polarized and corrupted  that a president of the United States cannot even attend an event devoted to  drawing people closer to God and bridge partisan and cultural divides without  being lectured about his policies.”

Dr. Carson is an African American physician, director of Pediatric  Neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, who rose out of poverty in a ghetto in  Detroit. He was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President Bush in  2008 and is a role model for every American of every background.

I’m also proud that he serves on the national advisory board of my  organization, CURE.

Although Carson did mention these various aspects of how we manage – or  mismanage – our national affairs, he never once referred to the president or  associated his comments on these issues with any political party.

To the extent to which President Obama might have taken Dr. Carson’s remarks  as personal criticism, it would only be in the sense of “If the shoe fits, wear  it.”

To the contrary, Dr. Carson began his remarks with citations from Proverbs  and Chronicles and tied the issues he spoke about to his broader theme about the  moral crisis of our nation today. He talked about the moral decay of ancient  Rome and how “they destroyed themselves from within.”

And he then expressed optimism about Americans being able to solve our  problems because “we are smart” and that “we have some of the most  intellectually gifted people leading our nation.”

No, if President Obama was offended by Dr. Carson’s penetrating remarks, it  is because the president had to be the one losing perspective of the moral tone  of the event and Dr. Carson’s observations.

What seems to offend Cal Thomas is that Dr. Carson has not fallen victim to  the Washington disease that Thomas himself seems to have contracted as result of  too many years in our nation’s capital.

Carson noted the vital importance of freedom of expression in America and how  “political correctness keeps people from talking about important issues while  the fabric of the society is being changed.” He warned that “we can’t fall for  this trick.”

What, after all, is the point of a National Prayer Breakfast, “devoted to  drawing people closer to God,” if the core issue now dividing us is whether we  are indeed a “nation under God” and whether this means that His Word, as  revealed in Scripture, is even relevant to our national life and how we conduct  our affairs.

This Word has already been banished from our public schools and increasingly  from all our public spaces. Now apparently it’s even off limits at the National  Prayer Breakfast.

If anything, Dr. Carson was forgiving to not mention the moral disaster of  abortion legal under any circumstances and 55 million murdered unborn children –  supported by our president. Nor did he mention our president’s endorsement of  same-sex marriage and today’s collapse of the American family.

The prophet Isaiah admonished, “To what purpose is the multitude of your  sacrifices to me? says the Lord … even when you make many prayers I will not  hear: your hands are full of blood … cease to do evil, learn to do good. …”

Religious ritual devoid of content is pointless and destructive. This was  Isaiah’s message 2,800 years ago.

This is Dr. Ben Carson’s critical message for America today. It’s certainly  nothing to apologize about.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/ben-carson-owes-no-apologies/#Qwo8FFHSCcJSP7sv.99

Saturday, February 16, 2013

Funny, he's never around when things happen. Why?

Graham: Obama Knew of Benghazi Threat, Acted 'After Everybody Was Dead'

President Barack Obama was aware of two IED attacks on the Benghazi consulate in Libya in the months leading up the the Sept. 11 attack that killed U. S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three others, U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham claims.

The South Carolina Republican said James Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence, told him the president was informed of attacks in April and June, Fox News reports.

The June attack blew a hole in the perimeter wall of the Benghazi compound, and the two strikes were reportedly part of dozens of incidents in the region that are considered warning signs of the deadly attacks in September.

Urgent: Should Obama Ban Guns? Vote in Poll

Graham criticized Obama for a White House statement saying the president did not talk to Libya's leader until the evening of Sept. 12, a day after the embassy was attacked.

“(He talked) after everybody was dead,” said Graham, suggesting Obama could have made a difference if he'd been involved earlier, but “you got a commander in chief who is absolutely disengaged. You got the secretary of State never talking to the secretary of Defense."

Graham's disclosure came after several Capitol Hill hearings in which several top administration officials, including former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton claimed they were not aware of the security problems at the Libyan compound.

Clinton said she never saw an Aug. 16 State Department cable warning that the consulate could not sustain a coordinated attack, but outgoing Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey said they knew about the warning.

A DNI spokesman said the Obama administration has been cooperative with Congress over the Libya questions. However, White House counter-terrorism adviser John Brennan, during his confirmation hearings for CIA director, said much of the information about what Obama knew falls under the category of “executive privilege,” a status often used to avoid disclosing information.

On Thursday, Republicans united to stall Obama's nomination of Chuck Hagel to succeed Panetta, especially over outstanding questions on the Benghazi attack.

Friday, February 15, 2013

The State of Denial.!

Obama’s State Of Denial

February 14, 2013 by Wayne Allyn Root 

 

Hello, I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. There are a lot of things you can change in life, but you can’t fix stupid. Barack Obama’s speech Tuesday wasn’t a State of the Union. It was a “State of Denial.” It was denial mixed with delusion. It was a state of addiction to spending. It was a modern-day fairy tale in the middle of a Great Depression. It was a “Let’s sing ‘Kum Ba Yah’ and hold hands while we solve the world’s problems with money we don’t have” speech. It was insanity squared.

Here’s how Obama solves problems. In the middle of a Great Depression, he wants to raise the minimum wage by almost $2 per hour. Delusional. Like a “Saturday Night Live” skit.

In the middle of a Great Depression he wants to raise taxes again — only days after he just raised them. In Obama’s world, we raise taxes every few weeks.

In the middle of a Great Depression with our government $100 trillion in debt, he wants to spend money on a long wish list of leftist fairy tales: from early childhood education to infrastructure to green energy to climate change to government employees to redesigning high schools to — get this one — eradicating poverty around the world.

We’re broke with $100 trillion in debt and he’s worried about poverty around the world? One in three Illinois residents lives in poverty. Maybe Obama should worry about his own State before he tackles world poverty. Denial and delusion.

Obama says we’re seeing progress, we’re in recovery, we have jobs, we have “cleared away the rubble of crisis” and we have a “strong state of the union.” I guess he wants you to forget that the 4th quarter gross domestic product was negative. Our economy is actually in contraction. And 11,000 Americans join the food stamp rolls every day. This isn’t a recovery; it’s an economic disaster. Denial and delusion.

Obama said jobs are doing better. I guess that depends on your definition of “better.” According to data from Bloomberg, from December 2011 to January 2013, nonfarm payrolls were down by 587,000. During just the past year of Obama’s “recovery,” we lost more than half a million jobs. Denial and delusion.

With a loss of 587,000 jobs, 8.5 million Americans dropping out of the workforce since Obama became President and the real unemployment number (U-6) at almost 15 percent, did you hear that Obama closed his Jobs Council last week? They hadn’t met in a year. Now that the election is over, he just closed it down. No need to meet at all. Why talk about jobs anymore? Denial and delusion.

But it fits perfectly with Obama’s claim that we can create so many middle-class jobs with wind, solar and other green energy projects. Complete denial of the fact that Spain is the “Green Energy Capital of Europe,” yet its economy has collapsed — with 26 percent unemployment and 56 percent youth unemployment. The proof is in: There are no green jobs. Denial and delusion.

Obama said we sold a lot of cars last year. What he didn’t tell you was your tax money propped up the sales. Federal government purchase of cars was up by more than 70 percent last year. It’s all government. We live in a one-company town. Denial and delusion.

Obama also gloated about the housing recovery. So let’s see, if your home went from $500,000 down to $100,000, but in the past year it soared up to $125,000, Obama gloats and declares victory. But that homeowner is bankrupt, underwater and in foreclosure. That lousy $25,000 increase versus a $400,000 loss during Obama’s first term just isn’t very helpful. Denial and delusion.

And to celebrate a housing recovery while demanding the end to what Obama calls “loopholes” must be some kind of joke on the American people. That “loophole” Obama refers to is our mortgage deduction. He wants to take it away in the middle of a housing collapse already worse than the peak of the Great Depression, thereby overnight causing another housing collapse. We’d all lose 40 percent of the value of our homes overnight if our mortgage deduction was eliminated. Denial and delusion.

But the funniest claim of all was Obama stating that he’s already cut $2.5 trillion from the budget. “We’re halfway home to $4 trillion in cuts” he said. This is Chris Rock funny. Nothing was cut. The fiscal cliff deal just added $4 trillion to the national debt. The few tiny cuts that were made were revealed by the Office of Management and Budget to be money that was never going to be spent anyway. Obama cut nothing. Zero. Zip. Nada.

The man who promised to cut the deficit in half but instead doubled it, who called President George W. Bush a disgrace and “unpatriotic” for adding $4 trillion to the national debt in eight years but who added $6 trillion himself in only four years… that same guy says “we’re halfway home” to solving our debt problem. Denial and delusion.

The same man who thinks the sequestration that cuts only $85 billion out of a $3.5 trillion budget is “harsh, devastating and reckless”… that man claims he’s going to solve our debt problem? He thinks more debt spent on green energy and early childhood education will get us “halfway home”? Denial and delusion.

Hell of a plan. But when you raise the minimum raise for millions of employees, the businesses they work for raise prices for the rest of us. Picture Wal-Mart, Target and every other retailer in America raising prices by 15 percent in the middle of a Great Depression to pay for Obama’s minimum wage increase. Then watch this Obama economy continue its death spiral.

Obama’s State of the Union was a “State of Denial” proving that you can change a lot of things in this world, but you can’t fix stupid.

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

These are words Everyone can live by..!

"The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral, begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. Instead of diminishing evil, it multiplies it. Through violence you may murder the liar, but you cannot murder the lie, nor establish the truth. Through violence you murder the hater, but you do not murder hate. In fact, violence merely increases hate. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that."

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

where's my mustache?

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

She needs a new headset...!

Nancy Pelosi says “it was almost a false argument to say the US has a spending problem.” LIKE if you agree Nancy Pelosi is an idiot and part of the problem!

Friday, February 1, 2013

Next time maybe they'll get their heads out of their A??.!

Some Unions Turning On Obamacare, Say It Will Drive Up Costs After All 

Posted: January 31, 2013
FullscreenClose
Obamacare has its flaws

I’ll say it again: Today  is not a good day for Obamacare. After today’s report that some poor  families may be priced out of the Affordable Care Act, potentially leaving  500,000 children without medical coverage, now some union leaders are saying  that Obama’s signature legislation will actually drive up costs and  make unionized workers less competitive.

The Wall Street Journal reports that though labor  unions originally supported the Obama administration’s healthcare plan when it  was being debated, the closer we get to fully implementing the Affordable Care  Act, the more skeptical and wary they have become.

Some union leaders have turned outright on Obamacare, reporting that the  law’s requirements will end up driving up costs for healthcare plans, which will  make union workers less competitive. The law gets rid of caps on medical  benefits and prescription drugs, which are used as “cost-containment measures”  in other privatized healthcare plans.

The ACA also allows children to remain under their parents’ medical coverage  plan until age 26.

Some of these union leaders are now asking for  federal insurance subsidies for their lower-paid members while remaining on  their plans. These subsidies were designed for low-income workers without  employer coverage in order to help them buy private insurance, but (and it’s a  big but) those subsidies are ambiguously defined.

This “glitch” means, as  we reported earlier, that many low-income families will be priced out of ACA  coverage. The Obama administration tried, and failed, to solve this problem  through the IRS earlier today, and then shifted blame for the “glitch” onto  Congress.

Naturally, opponents of Obamacare are thrilled  by this new development. The Blaze, a right-leaning political blog,  expressed incredulity at some union leaders attempts to “avoid paying for the  costs associated with Obamacare.”

What do you think of Obamacare?

Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/504486/some-unions-turning-on-obamacare-say-it-will-drive-up-costs-after-all/#UQ13OiodBc6Jupzl.99