Truesee's Daily Wonder

Truesee presents the weird, wild, wacky and world news of the day.

Monday, March 22, 2010


Mistress must pay wronged wife $6,000,000

Mistress told to pay wronged wife $6,000,000: U.S. jury uses 19th-century adultery law to punish lover

Mail Foreign Service
9:02 AM on 22nd March 2010


When Cynthia Shackelford's marriage fell apart, it wasn't her husband she dragged into court.

Using a little-known American law, she sued his mistress for stealing him away.

The lawsuit did not win back her cheating husband, but it did give her a measure of revenge after a jury ordered the mistress to pay her the equivalent of $6million.

Mrs Shackelford, 60, said she gave up her teaching career to raise the couple's two children and support 62-year-old husband Allan's legal career.

Cynthia Shackleford sued Anne Lundquist, left, for stealing her husband, Allan Shackelford, right away from her

And she insisted they were still in love when 49-year-old college administrator Anne Lundquist came along.

'I really loved him and I really thought he loved me,' she said. I had not a clue that Allan would wander. He kept telling me, "Oh, she's just a friend. There's no affair. I love you".'

In her lawsuit, the jilted wife also claimed her husband began having the affair before they separated in 2005.

Following a two-day trial in Greensboro, North Carolina, the jury sided with Mrs Shackelford, making the state's highest award for alienation of affection, criminal conversation  -  legal jargon for adultery  -  and intentionally or recklessly causing severe emotional distress.

North Carolina remains one of a handful of states which allow married partners to sue someone they believe is responsible for wrecking a marriage.

Mrs Shackelford said her husband met Miss Lundquist while providing legal services for the local Guildford College private school.

She said: 'We would like for people to respect the sanctity of marriage. We wanted a number high enough that it would keep other people from going after married spouses.'

Miss Lundquist said she planned to appeal against the 'ludicrous' judgment.

She lives with Mr Shackelford in Aurora, New York, but insisted the couple met after his marriage had ended. She said: 'The decision is not based on reality. I certainly don't have that kind of money nor will I ever.'

Miss Lundquist, now dean of students at Wells College in Aurora, said she was not given enough notice to prepare for the hearing and was not represented.

'I'm so caught off guard by everything,' she added, saying that finding that kind of money was 'hysterical'.

Although the Shackelfords separated five years ago, their divorce has not been finalised. More than 200 'alienation of affection' cases are filed in North Carolina each year.

The legislation existed in many U.S. states in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, but has been abolished in all but North Carolina, Hawaii, Illinois, Mississippi, New Mexico and Utah.

Although action does not require proof of extramarital sex, the wronged spouse must show that a love in a marriage was alienated and destroyed by the defendant's 'malicious conduct'.

Mrs Shackelford's lawyer, Will Jordan, admitted that securing the full $6million would be difficult.

But he said: 'I'm hoping we'll collect a substantial sum.

'In addition to just collecting the judgment, there's a certain amount of validation or vindication that goes with having a jury acknowledge that you were done wrong.'


Read more:

That's just ridiculous.
Post a Comment

<< Home


June 2021   May 2021   April 2021   March 2021   February 2021   January 2021   December 2020   November 2020   October 2020   September 2020   August 2020   July 2020   June 2020   May 2020   April 2020   March 2020   February 2020   January 2020   December 2019   November 2019   October 2019   September 2019   August 2019   July 2019   June 2019   May 2019   April 2019   March 2019   February 2019   January 2019   December 2018   November 2018   October 2018   September 2018   August 2018   July 2018   June 2018   May 2018   April 2018   March 2018   February 2018   January 2018   December 2017   November 2017   October 2017   September 2017   August 2017   July 2017   June 2017   May 2017   April 2017   March 2017   February 2017   January 2017   December 2016   November 2016   October 2016   September 2016   August 2016   July 2016   June 2016   May 2016   April 2016   March 2016   February 2016   January 2016   December 2015   November 2015   October 2015   September 2015   August 2015   July 2015   June 2015   May 2015   April 2015   March 2015   February 2015   January 2015   December 2014   November 2014   October 2014   September 2014   August 2014   July 2014   June 2014   May 2014   April 2014   March 2014   February 2014   January 2014   December 2013   November 2013   October 2013   September 2013   August 2013   July 2013   June 2013   May 2013   April 2013   March 2013   February 2013   January 2013   December 2012   November 2012   October 2012   September 2012   August 2012   July 2012   June 2012   May 2012   April 2012   March 2012   February 2012   January 2012   December 2011   November 2011   October 2011   September 2011   August 2011   July 2011   June 2011   May 2011   April 2011   March 2011   February 2011   January 2011   December 2010   November 2010   October 2010   September 2010   August 2010   July 2010   June 2010   May 2010   April 2010   March 2010   February 2010   January 2010   December 2009   November 2009   October 2009   September 2009   August 2009   July 2009   June 2009   May 2009   April 2009   March 2009   February 2009   January 2009   December 2008  

Powered by Lottery PostSyndicated RSS FeedSubscribe