maddogs hideaway

Welcome to Maddogs hideaway, The poormans predictor. Somedays I just feel like ridin...!

Name: MADDOG10
Location: Beautiful Florida
Country: United States
Interests: restoring old cars, winning the lottery, avid football fan, and riding my motorcycles... Both (Harleys)...!!

Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Are blacks really so blind?

Are blacks really so blind?

Exclusive: Mychal Massie on what community should really be outraged over

 

author-imageMychal  Massie About | Email | Archive 
Mychal Massie is the former chairman of the  National Leadership Network of Black Conservatives-Project 21 – a conservative  black think tank located in Washington, D.C. He was recognized as the 2008  Conservative Man of the Year by the Conservative Party of Suffolk County, N.Y.   He is a nationally recognized political activist, pundit and columnist. He has  appeared on Fox News Channel, CNN, MSNBC, C-SPAN, NBC, Comcast Cable and  talk-radio programming nationwide. A former self-employed business owner of more  than 30 years, Massie's website is mychal-massie.com.
       

I heard a defense attorney say that while she believed in the jury process  and felt that they had reached the right decision, “George Zimmerman being found  not guilty does not mean he is innocent.”

The first thing that came to my mind is every client she has should fire her  and that no one should employ her services ever again.  Imagine, your defense  attorney, for which you have paid handsomely, wins your case and then does an  interview where she suggests that even though you were found not guilty it  doesn’t mean you’re innocent.

 
Granted, she wasn’t in any way involved in the George Zimmerman trial, but  for her to publicly say something so patently offensive paints a picture of how  she feels about her white clients if, in fact, she has any.  Which brings me to  my point.

If the George Zimmerman trial has revealed one thing and one thing only, it  is that many blacks are still mental and emotional slaves on the plantations of  immiseration, victimology, and self-segregation.

They are easily led by emotion, and despite undeniable success in America,  many, if not most, would rather focus on a past (i.e., slavery) that no one  living today can in any way relate to and a period (i.e., Jim Crow) that  Americans of good conscience brought to an end 50 years ago.

Yet there they are protesting mythical and imagined wrongdoings as if white  people and the justice system have a secret code that dictates all blacks be  treated unfairly.  And the media eagerly and strenuously works to inculcate that  viewpoint. 

A half-Kenyan holds the most powerful office in the world.  Blacks are the  political leaders and elected officials in many of the nation’s cities.  There  is no shortage of schools headed by blacks.  Fortune 500 companies are run by  blacks, as are hospitals.  You cannot watch a television show without seeing a  black actor.  From laborer to business owner blacks are represented.

The cries for revenge and insistence that George Zimmerman’s acquittal for  killing Trayvon Martin in self-defense somehow translates into a death threat to  all young black men are beyond irrational to me.  As I wrote in my column “The ugly truth about  Trayvon,” Martin would be alive today had he not made the decision to attack  George Zimmerman.

It is incongruous to me that people choose to exhibit national outrage over  one justifiable incident while they ignore atrocities that said outrage would be  well spent addressing.

Where is the outrage over approximately 1,500 unborn black children being  murdered daily by Planned Parenthood and other abortion mills?  Where is the  outrage over the single-parent homes?  Where is the outrage over the  black-on-black crime rates?  Approxiamtely 8,000 blacks are murdered annually,  and other blacks commit 93 percent of these murders.  In Chicago alone, more  than 200 blacks have been murdered so far this year.  Where is the outrage over  that?  Where is the outrage over illegal aliens Mexicans murdering blacks as  part of their initiation into violent gangs?

Blacks I’ve observed doing on-air interviews, etc. are upset that George Zimmerman was acquitted. But it is not the George Zimmermans who take a person’s life in self-defense whom they should fear – it is the gang-bangers and hoodlums on the streets who are killing one another with reckless abandon because someone wore the wrong color shirt in their neighborhood. Blacks need not fear the George Zimmermans who justifiably protect themselves; blacks need fear having their children playing in front of their residence when a car drives by and sprays bullets at the building.

How in the name of sanity can those that are claiming injustice pursuant to  George Zimmerman sit silent about all of the other atrocities blacks are  inflicting upon themselves?

Have inculcated immiseration, victimology and self-segregation so blinded  blacks that they are unable to see the truth?  Or is it that they are so given  over to antipathy that they refuse to see the truth?

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/07/are-blacks-really-so-blind/#PtSRQzUrv6ZQvJ6U.99

4 Comments:

emilyg said...

Good read. Thank you.

12:50 PM
winnnr said...

The title of this article should be changed to "Are some blacks really so blind"
It's stereotyping. Not all blacks agree with what's going on. It's wrong to imply that they do.

1:14 PM
CARBOB said...

I don't think he's implying that! I get the feeling that he is frustrated that the leader of our country and the ones who are doing all the race baiting, Sharpton, Jamie Foxx, Jessie Jackson, and other notables should be concentrating on the topics he spoke about, instead of misdirecting all of the blacks who are protesting. I may be wrong, but I don't think so.

1:37 PM
sully16 said...

Good article

10:13 PM

Post a Comment

<< Home