Truesee's Daily Wonder

Truesee presents the weird, wild, wacky and world news of the day.

Monday, January 26, 2015

 

Palin: Democrats are The Ones That Discriminate

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/01/25/palin-democrats-are-the-ones-that-really-discriminate/


Comments:
Okay, so here's an excerpt from 'roccolore' who is the second commentator down after the article:

And if Democrats are such champions of gays and women, why do they defend the Muslims who kill gays and force women into full-body potato sacks? But what do you expect from those who think cartoons are more offensive than beheadings?

What we are dealing with is Sharia Law, dude, which has been around forever in that region of the world. While their laws seem to allow such practices, it's their business, culture, religion and religion. When we go over there and attempt to tell them what they can't do to their people based on their laws, that's IMPOSING on them. They can't come over here and tell us what we can't do to them based on our laws. However, we still do seem to impose on our own citizens via Republican control and influence on specific issues. Check this excerpt and link where Bobby Jindal (R) speaks on Sharia Law:

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/397110/what-bobby-jindal-gets-about-islam-and-most-people-still-dont-andrew-c-mccarthy

Excerpt:

is not just different than our law, it’s not just a cultural difference, it is oppression and it is wrong. It subjugates women and treats them as property, and it is antithetical to valuing all of human life equally. It is the very definition of oppression. We must stop pretending otherwise.

Sharia law (Arabic: شريعة) is the body of Islamic law. The term means "way" or "path"; it is the legal framework within which the public and some private aspects of life are regulated for those living in a legal system based on Islam.

Subjugates women's rights, Bobby? Really? How about this development, article, and excerpt:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/congress/house-gop-abruptly-drops-plans-to-debate-abortion-bill/2015/01/21/d6f98708-a1e0-11e4-91fc-7dff95a14458_story.html

WOMEN HAVE A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO DECIDE WHAT HAPPENS TO THEIR BODY AND THEN GOD HAS THE LAST WORD/JUDGEMENT BASED ON THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH HIM (FORGIVENESS). THIS SHOULD BE BETWEEN WOMAN AND GOD...PERIOD, BECAUSE REPUBLICANS CAN'T PUT ANYONE INTO HEAVEN OR HELL.

Read the caption underneath the picture in this article and then just read the article itself...here's some excerpts:

(1) Democrats said such talk showed that Republicans were willing to subjugate women’s rights to political pandering to the crowds outside.

(2) Rep. Scott DesJarlais, R-Tenn., a doctor who opposes abortion rights, once urged a patient he was dating to seek an abortion. His aides did not return phone and email requests for comment.

(Yeah, he screwed her, got her pregnant, and told her to ABORT...A REPUBLICAN DOCTOR.)

The debate took a turn for the personal when Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., referred to “hypocrites on the other side of the aisle who have counseled their own girl friends to have abortions. It’s legal.”

(3) Republican leaders flinched at the prospect of forcing passage of anti-abortion legislation opposed by GOP women.

(Even Republican women don't want to be SUBJUGATED Bobby Jindal.)

Let's analyze this next excerpt by Boehner very carefully:

“This march is part of a longer one, and our destination is clear: to secure and protect the rights of every unborn child. When there is disagreement, we should pause and listen closely. When there is movement, we should rejoice, and the House’s vote to ban taxpayer funding of abortion is cause for doing so,” he said.

...to ban taxpayer funding of abortion is CAUSE FOR DOING SO.

Okay, John, then write a law for the non-funding of abortions by taxpayers ONLY and leave the whole RIGHTS thing ALONE, buddy. Republicans are trying to mix the two ideals here...religion and money. While the Separation of Church and State isn't in the Constitution, it's still a valid ideal based around separating personal emotions from law implementation.

I saved Sarah for last because the other issues I discussed had way more relevance and priority to this BS. As I said in another article, if the President were to treat only blacks in a special way (partiality) and only did things specific to them while restricting others, that would be...

dis·crim·i·na·tion


/dəˌskriməˈnāSH(ə)n/


noun

noun: discrimination; plural noun: discriminations

1.

the unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people or things, especially on the grounds of race, age, or sex.
"victims of racial discrimination"

synonyms: prejudice, bias, bigotry, intolerance, narrow-mindedness, unfairness, inequity, favoritism, one-sidedness, partisanship; More
sexism, chauvinism, misogyny, racism, racialism, anti-Semitism, heterosexism, ageism, classism, casteism;

historicalapartheid

"racial discrimination"

See, Sarah says Democrats but she's actually targeting Obama and BLACKS. Then, we have that other article where the black guy is so angry because the President DOESN'T HELP BLACKS ENOUGH, y'all. So, here we a President that seems to not help blacks enough while also discriminating against whites. If you're not really, really careful and doing your diligence, it's very easy to miss what's really going on, America. Pay attention.



Post a Comment

<< Home

Archives

March 2024   February 2024   January 2024   December 2023   November 2023   October 2023   September 2023   August 2023   July 2023   June 2023   May 2023   April 2023   March 2023   February 2023   January 2023   December 2022   November 2022   October 2022   September 2022   August 2022   July 2022   June 2022   May 2022   April 2022   March 2022   February 2022   January 2022   December 2021   November 2021   October 2021   September 2021   August 2021   July 2021   June 2021   May 2021   April 2021   March 2021   February 2021   January 2021   December 2020   November 2020   October 2020   September 2020   August 2020   July 2020   June 2020   May 2020   April 2020   March 2020   February 2020   January 2020   December 2019   November 2019   October 2019   September 2019   August 2019   July 2019   June 2019   May 2019   April 2019   March 2019   February 2019   January 2019   December 2018   November 2018   October 2018   September 2018   August 2018   July 2018   June 2018   May 2018   April 2018   March 2018   February 2018   January 2018   December 2017   November 2017   October 2017   September 2017   August 2017   July 2017   June 2017   May 2017   April 2017   March 2017   February 2017   January 2017   December 2016   November 2016   October 2016   September 2016   August 2016   July 2016   June 2016   May 2016   April 2016   March 2016   February 2016   January 2016   December 2015   November 2015   October 2015   September 2015   August 2015   July 2015   June 2015   May 2015   April 2015   March 2015   February 2015   January 2015   December 2014   November 2014   October 2014   September 2014   August 2014   July 2014   June 2014   May 2014   April 2014   March 2014   February 2014   January 2014   December 2013   November 2013   October 2013   September 2013   August 2013   July 2013   June 2013   May 2013   April 2013   March 2013   February 2013   January 2013   December 2012   November 2012   October 2012   September 2012   August 2012   July 2012   June 2012   May 2012   April 2012   March 2012   February 2012   January 2012   December 2011   November 2011   October 2011   September 2011   August 2011   July 2011   June 2011   May 2011   April 2011   March 2011   February 2011   January 2011   December 2010   November 2010   October 2010   September 2010   August 2010   July 2010   June 2010   May 2010   April 2010   March 2010   February 2010   January 2010   December 2009   November 2009   October 2009   September 2009   August 2009   July 2009   June 2009   May 2009   April 2009   March 2009   February 2009   January 2009   December 2008  

Powered by Lottery PostSyndicated RSS FeedSubscribe