Truesee's Daily Wonder

This Moron doesn't owe any loyalty to anyone except the American people. When she was elected she swore an oath to the Constitution Of , For , and By the people, not the Puppet...
She needs to be replaced with someone a little smarter.

Loyalty to Obama?
That puts her in a class no better than insurgent rebels. You can see where liberal loyalty and support of Obama has got us to in the past five years.

More of the same...moving on..

Oh, so it's all good to be loyal to Bushy and display just how loyal one is, but no loyalty is owed to Ba-Ba even by his own constituents. Condi' 'Leeza was completely loyal to Bushy and I can't find one iota of disagreement for her supporting, with loyalty, him...even after it was discovered that she received 'bad intel' on the Iraq deal, and, yet proceeded anyway. How soon the 'emotionally hateful and eager to criticize' soon forget the facts.

No one said 'she' needed to be replaced...she was commended by everyone and fully supported for her loyalty, and, upholding Bush's pitch of the world "coming to an end if we didn't go in." Now, let's talk a bit about the Constitution and Peace Treaty. El Rushbo actually 'implied' that BO had no need to uphold the Peace Treaty in this particular case. Oh, yeah...he did. He said, and I quote, "How old is this 'thing' (sarcastically about the Peace Treaty). It's as old as the Geneva Convention!" That's scary...very scary because we must consider just how 'old' our Constitution is which they insure the (D)'s hold to high standards...yet, he downplays our Peace Treaty of the same standards which includes nations abroad. Sean was in the same boat.

The irony in how they push so very hard on the 2nd Amendment...the Constitution, but want to completely ignore the NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty) i.e. no chemical weapons usage. Saddam Hussein was beating, torturing, beheading, burning, and poisoning his people and we never stepped in until....reports of him utilizing CHEMICAL WEAPONS on his people surfaced. We then acted, very quickly I might add, and there was no push back.

So, now, here we are again in the same sand box with a different name...Syria. All the Rushs', Sean's, Michael Berrys', Michael Savages', and many others are displaying the ONE thing they supposedly say doesn't exist....DISCRIMINATION. We can go to Iraq on chemical weapons warfare, but we cannot go to Syria where it's proven that the NPT has clearly been violated.

Michael Berry said, "It shouldn't matter that children were killed with chemical weapons 'cause they've been killed with firearms, too, and we did nothing then. Sean said essentially the same thing..."100,000 people have did there and we haven't done anything in all this time. Now, we're gonna go in because 1,000+ have been gassed with chemical weapons?" Wow! Imagine that. We like Iraq under Bush, but hate Syria under Obama, yet, they fall on the SAME PREMISES. Sure, there's a money issue at hand which may require 'supplemental funding" which is the only difference in this and Iraq.

Bush had all that money, the surplus, to play with when he took office and put that war on a 'black card'. Yep, just like both Rush and Sean always famously say, "You just can't make this stuff up!" So many sound bytes that all these clowns leave out because they don't support what they're preaching just like the whole 'red line' deal. Everyone attending the hearing knows exactly what the 'global red line' is in relation to what BO said.

They took it completely out of its' context. 'Red line', 'last straw', 'line in the sand', 'breaking point'...they all infer the same thing in terms of when he knows he MUST TAKE ACTION according to the law. I think it's so funny and trivial how this is all they can drum up to elaborate/play/harp on...and the sawdust-for-brains folk buy it.

I do have a problem with one thing in this resolution, though. There seems to be a lack of an 'end objective', or, a contradiction thereof. Jay Carney and John Kerry were far from in the same boat when questioned about this. Either we want a regime change or we don't. We can't go over there and think we'll 'scare' Assad into dancing to our music with a couple of bombs. John Mc Cain voted against a limited strike and said he wants more force used to accomplish a particular objective...and I agree.

P.S. A guy named 'James" just wrote and told Rush that, " The American people are having a hard time with Syria due to the 'mess' that Bush made with Iraq. Otherwise, this is a no brainer." As expected, Rush slammed him and claimed that it was the 'media' which made a mess of Iraq.

(2nd) Caller: Rush, I wanna know where all the proof is...we have absolutely no proof of any of this." Wow! What a dumb phuck! Vladimir Putin's delegation has 100 pages that chemical weapons were used, and, that it was likely by the Syrian Rebels...and not Al Queda like Sean and Rush were trying to push. Still in the early stages, though. Okay, class is dismissed for now.