How welfare has managed to take 'work' out of working class
Sandra Parsons
Daily Mail
8:41 AM on 30th June 2010
Generous benefits: Frank Field, poverty adviser to David Cameron, says many men are better off staying out of work.
What has happened to a significant number of Britain's working-class men? Well, as Frank Field, the Labour MP who has been made a poverty adviser by David Cameron, has pointed out, for too many of them, the adjective 'working' no longer applies.
Thanks to a generous welfare system, many of them have calculated that they are better off staying at home than they would be doing anything so proletarian as a hard day's work.
According to Field, many young men today feel that jobs paying less than $300 a week are not worth their while.
I know it's unfashionable to say it, but anyone can find work if they really want to. When we were first married, my husband, as a non-EU doctor, was not allowed to practise until he had passed exams proving both his English and his medical competency.
I was working full-time, so he could have stayed at home. Instead, he found a job as a cook in a wine bar. He had no experience, but reasoned that anyone could grill a burger and throw together a salad. Soon, he was working double shifts and earning more than he subsequently did in his first year as a junior doctor.
But instead of finding whatever work they can, too many of Britain's poorest young men choose to stay at home, easily able to afford the satellite television and cans of strong beer that all too often fuel their day.
Unsurprisingly, they feel useless and frustrated - emotions that too many are unable to analyse, but which explode into aggression, violence and crime, together with a terrifyingly feckless attitude to procreating with different women.
I say procreating because their loveless actions have nothing to do with fathering. For any child, the lack of a strong, responsible father figure is a tragedy.
Despite what our politicians think, most single mothers do not want to go out to work, at least until their children are older.
What they, and their children, want is a man to fulfil a role that used to be taken for granted and which these days seems almost quaint: that of provider.
If a young boy does not see his father getting up and going to work every day, why should he go to school - still less aspire to a job afterwards?
And why should he treat women with respect if that role model doesn't? Thus our disastrous welfare system creates a cycle of dependency.
Yesterday the Government announced its new Work Programme, under which millions on benefits will be forced to make daily efforts to find a job - and those who refuse will have their benefits curtailed.
The inspiration for this reform has come from the U.S., where it's claimed similar welfare reforms introduced by Bill Clinton saw dole queues fall by as much as 80 per cent in some states.
And what happens when a man goes out to work is this: he starts to believe in himself and find some self-respect. And then he finds those around him start to believe in him and respect him, too.
'Why can't a woman be more like a man?' asked Professor Higgins in My Fair Lady as he tried to transform recalcitrant <snip>ney Eliza Doolittle into a lady.
The question Professor Higgins might ask these days of a boozed-up man with several children by different mothers is: 'Why can't a man be more like a man?'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1290752/How-welfare-managed-work-working-class.html#ixzz0sKhwHdZl
April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008