Yeahh

We put together the Temperature Anomaly and Atlantic Cyclone Power to see if there's an effect on cyclone power.

Well, there's something of a paradox.

The proposed increase in temperature doesn't seem to affect the cyclone power; most notably beginning in 1980.

If there is a temperature increase, there should be a power increase.

Below is the graph of the Temperature Anomaly and Atlantic Cyclone Power.

You can see there is a remarkable change in the Temperature Anomaly, yet, Atlantic Cyclone Power seems to be relatively level.

From here on, this is just opinion.

What we find interesting is the Temperature Anomaly seems to All-Of-A-Suddenly increase after 1979.

What event happened in 1979? The First World Climate Conference was held in Geneva in February of 1979.

Then again, All-Of-A-Sudden, after 2014, the Temperature Anomaly shot up again.

What event happened around 2014? The Climatic Research Unit email controversy in 2012 and the following years 2013-2014 people noted there was a stall in the Temperature Anomaly.

It seems the Temperature Anomaly works in perfect harmony with petty grasping human ambition.

A paradox seems to be in order.

What we've found in our dealings with paradoxes is one part of a paradox tends to be false; thereby collapsing the paradox altogether.

If the Temperature Anomaly were fudged, it would collapse the paradox.

But, there is that Cyclone Power.

It doesn't seem to be fudged.

Why, we ask our self.

Well, temperatures are easy to manipulate.

There are places on this planet where most people never go; easy to add a degree here and there.

However, cyclones are a problem.

They are seen and felt by vastly more people; a little harder to manipulate when it's raining in your backyard.

You see the event yourself, you see the real power and tell if there's something amiss with the data.

We've detected changes in the cyclone data.

Maybe those changes were for a reason.

We'll let you decide.

Below are graphs of our calculated values of Atlantic Cyclone Power of each event.

You'll notice there is no Y-axis scale.

That's not a problem, because, all we want to show is relative power between events.

Also, for the same justification that some professionals have used the presentation of data in the anomaly format.

Don't like it, Go Function Yourself.

This graph show all the power values with any observational bias due to policy and/or technology.

Just looking at this we can see there are some differences between year ranges.

We detected at least 6 different ranges and have highlighted those suspected years.

The differences seem a little more clear.

Below, we have changed the Y-axis to a Logarithmic scale, and the range differences become even more clear.

We can adjust for these differences to make the values relatively matched for the changes in policy/technology.

Here we can see the graph with these observational bias removed.

Next, we can average these yearly, non-linear values in to a yearly average.

Below is the adjusted yearly averages for cyclone power.

We can see around 1947 the power has been fairly level till about 1999, then peaks at 2005 and comes down.

It has risen by looking at the Regression Wave, but next year's average may play a factor in the direction of the Regression Wave.

The next 3 years could be interesting.

We have detected at least 6 different date ranges where observational bias may have affected the data due to policy and/or technology changes.

They are as follows:

1851 - 1870
1871 - 1897
1898 - 1966
1967 - 1981
1982 - 1994
1995 - 2017 (current date)

There's nearly a month left in the 2017 Hurricane Season.

We'll be posting an update on the observationally modified power values shortly.

Not easy to find the years the payouts changed, but we got it.

Powerball History
1992-04-22 to 1997-11-01: 5/45 and 1/45, 20 Year Payout
1997-11-05 to 2002-10-05: 5/49 and 1/42, 25 Year Payout
2002-10-09 to 2005-08-27: 5/53 and 1/42, 30 Year Payout
2005-08-31 to 2009-01-03: 5/55 and 1/42, 30 Year Payout
2009-01-07 to 2012-01-14: 5/59 and 1/39, 30 Year Payout
2012-01-18 to 2015-10-03: 5/59 and 1/35, 30 Year Payout
2015-10-07 to -Present- : 5/69 and 1/26, 30 Year Payout

Mega Millions History
1996-09-06 to 1999-01-12: 5/50 and 1/25, 20 Year Payout
1999-01-15 to 2002-05-14: 5/50 and 1/36, 20 Year Payout
2002-05-17 to 2005-06-21: 5/52 and 1/52, 26 Year Payout
2005-06-24 to 2013-10-18: 5/56 and 1/46, 26 Year Payout
2013-10-22 to 2017-10-27: 5/75 and 1/15, 30 Year Payout
2017-10-31 to -present- : 5/70 and 1/25, 30 Year Payout

partial source www.usamega.com

.

Make'em look like they really are.

www.infowars.com

The liberal media is losing their minds:

Women are spamming it with one star reviews and calling for it to be banned from Apple and Google’s app stores, though men love it:

This one of Chelsea Clinton got run through a few too many times:

Taylor Swift and the Trumps look great:

The media responded to the app by accusing developer Ashot Gabrelyanov of being a Kremlin agent — no joke.

Gabrelyanov said he’s going to sue Business Insider for lying about him:

One liberal media writer at Slate tried to stick it to Gabrelyanov by running him through the app:

... without the NFL.

We see a massive block of ice slamming down hard.

Hope you're ready for what will seem like the next Ice Age.

Blizzard after Blizzard... ...uhff, just chills to think about it.

The following chart and table are updated with the most recent data.

It factors in a minor set of temporal variations.

There's less than 2 months left in the 2017 season.

We're making a tweak to the Atlantic Accumulated Cyclone Power.

There's not a big difference from the last calculation, just an adjustment related to variations in temporal readings.

Also, it will reflect the latest TS Rina floating out in the North Atlantic.

We'll post a little later.

We've been looking over the Atlantic Accumulated Cyclone Energy or ACE.

It seems a bit odd the measurement focuses on peak energy.

It's like having your electric bill based only on your peak energy usage.

That's absurd, energy providers wouldn't get much that way.

Is there another way to measure energy usage?

YEP, it is call power, or Watts.

It's the measurement of energy over time, or the amount of work over time, sometimes in units of kg m² / s³ or J / s.

Funny thing about the ACE is the measurement leaves out the kg or mass and it's measured in kn².

You can see the their equation at the link above.

OK, well, if that's good for them, it's good for us, we can do that, too.

Instead of using just the max velocity or peak energy of the cyclone, we used a measurement of the entire life of the cyclone and sum up all the power values.

The Accumulated Cyclone Power is measured in kn² / h, square knots per hour.

Below are the chart and table for our rework.

If we Rank the top 10, it would be the following:

We see something virtually coming.

Watch for it.

BIG, BIG Event.

TWTR

We've invested in such a way as to drive it down.

Useless Hypocritical Censoring Monster.