Truesee's Daily Wonder

Like I posted earlier today:
Rinse and repeat:
These arrogant global control freak a$$holes actually believe, we will believe, they can affect the Earth's weather. It is all about control, and sadly, a foolish large percentage of people believe this crap. It is about the politicos taking all our freedoms and wealth away for themselves so they can rule w/o impediment, that is all. our rulers are all for it.

The only opinion I would give some thought would be Putin.

Okay, let's just cut the BS. FYI, it wasn't the Democrats who FIRST became very involved and concerned with climate change, okay. I know that term just burns you Republicans' ears but, that's your problem and it's gonna be EVERYBODY'S problem at some point. More than likely, we'll all be dead and our younger cousins, nephews, kids, etc. will have to reap what we've sown. Laugh and deny it all you want but, if you honestly think that all these chemicals released by refineries do not affect the ecosystem then you're still in the stone age. Why in hell do you think that aerosols were banned BACK IN THE 80's?? Because they were DEPLETING THE DA*MNED OZONE LAYER!!! Article from 1976:


http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20067003,00.html


Now, in 1981, Exxon KNEW OF CLIMATE CHANGE because they were conducting studies on it. When they found out that they the impact on the ecosystem was POSITIVE, the began spending money and campaigning WITH THE DENIERS...because it would ultimately get out and would hurt their business:

http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/7/9/exxon-knew-of-human-role-in-climate-change-in-1981.html

-Scientists knew by the 1950s that climate change could be a risk for humanity, but it wasn’t until 1988 that it became public knowledge, after NASA scientist James Hansen testified before Congress that scientific data had confirmed human’s role in climate change, the report said. The same year, the United Nations formed the IPCC.-

-Exxon knew about the connection between fossil fuels and climate change well ahead of the rest of industry and the public, the report said. Though Exxon knew first and continued funding climate denial, other industry actors also sowed uncertainty about the human role in global warming after becoming aware of scientific evidence.-

http://climatecrocks.com/2015/07/09/documents-show-exxon-aware-of-climate-change-since-1981/


You can do your own diligence from here. You know what? If it were ever confirmed by Jesus Himself that he was more Liberal than Conservative, (and HE ALWAYS GAVE, NEVER TOOK...WAS MERCIFUL AND LIBERAL), then Republicans would stop believing in Him, stop going to Church, stop praying, they'd stop EVERYTHING 'cause they hate Liberals. Tell you what, open the door to your house, apartment etc. and back your vehicle up to the front door. Mash the pedal half way to the floor and and position it there. Then, open the door to your place and just let the fumes mix in with the air already in there...don't open any windows, either.

Let's see just how long you smart azz deniers last, okay. Better start using your brains...

You mean like the exhaust pipe stuck in the refrigerator?   Great volumetric analogy, the earth as a refrigerator and a car pumping exhaust into the refrigerator, and let me guess the car is a 68' Vista Cruiser, right?

Some copy/paste from today's headlines.

http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/29/skeptical-climate-documentary-set-to-rock-un-climate-summit-film-to-have-red-carpet-premiere-in-paris/

http://www.latimes.com/local/weather/la-me-ln-california-freeze-sierras-20151128-story.html

http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/616937/GLOBAL-COOLING-Decade-long-ice-age-predicted-as-sun-hibernates

http://news.sky.com/story/1596318/poll-growing-doubts-over-climate-change-causes

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/globalwarming/11395516/The-fiddling-with-temperature-data-is-the-biggest-science-scandal-ever.html

Okay, let's play...you're validating my points. First of all, I said 'climate change' and not 'global warming.' My analogy of the vehicle pumping emissions into the house is on par with the ban on aerosols...it was reducing the ozone which filters out poisons and ultraviolet. The less emissions the less damage on the ozone. Excerpts taken from your links:

-"There is a time lag in the climate system," he said.

"We are storing up problems that we haven't yet seen because the climate system takes decades to respond to the carbon dioxide.-

-"So even if we cut emissions dramatically today there are big problems stored up for future. This is why we need to take urgent action."-


-The film is the first climate documentary to profile scientists who have reversed their views from supporting the so-called “consensus” position to a conversion to skepticism. The film also profiles politically left scientists who have now declared themselves skeptics of man-made global warming.-

A team of European researchers have unveiled a scientific model showing that the Earth is likely to experience a “mini ice age” from 2030 to 2040 as a result of decreased solar activity.

-Their findings will infuriate environmental campaigners who argue by 2030 we could be facing increased sea levels and flooding due to glacial melt at the poles.-

Sooo, why not investigate Exxon and NASA's findings? I mean, this took place way back when it first jumped off and Exxon has the proof. All these people in your links are going after OBAMA and have said NOTHING ABOUT EXXON AND NASA. None of your Republican boys have said nothing about or Exxon and NASA. Yeah, y'all trust NASA to put a man on the moon but, NOT TO ELABORATE ON CLIMATE CHANGE, huh? Nobody wants to question Exxon, huh? Yep, you know who to stay away from. They really banned aerosols because stick deodorant wasn't getting enough business...now go Google that.

http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

Hell, even your boy Ted Cruz just ignored Exxon and NASA altogether and seemed to itemize the year 1998 for his argument. Finally, as for your attempting to ridicule my analogy, the Earth has an atmosphere that is SEALED, okay. Warming is plain and simply common sense. So is FREEZING. Read very carefully:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/earth/cause-ice-age.html

ATMOSPHERIC CARBON DIOXIDE
Changes in the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are a strong candidate to explain the overall pattern of climatic change. Carbon dioxide influences the mean global temperature through the greenhouse effect. The globally averaged surface temperature for the Earth is approximately 15 degrees Celsius, and this is due largely to the greenhouse effect. Solar radiation entering earth's atmosphere is predominantly short wave, while heat radiated from the Earth's surface is long wave. Water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, and other trace gases in the Earth's atmosphere absorb this long wave radiation. Because the Earth does not allow this long wave radiation to leave, the solar energy is trapped and the net effect is to warm the Earth. If not for the presence of an atmosphere, the surface temperature on earth would be well below the freezing point of water.

LL, you're wasting your time with a moron. Jarasan likes to ridicule things he doesn't understand. He's immature and its like trying to explain something to a toad.

Trolls and science, LMBAO, gobbledygook, the EARTH'S ATOMOSPHERE IS NOT SEALED YOU F'ING MORON, use the pea brain and think hard. Short wave long wave are you kidding me??????

JARASAN, you stupid AZZ, the ozone layer (O3) protects us from HARMFUL rays from the sun. BTW, the (O3) is formed by 3 oxygen atoms. It forms when some type of radiation or electrical discharge separates the two atoms in an oxygen molecule (O2), which can then individually recombine with other oxygen molecules to form ozone (O3). This lesson is free JARASAN. Stay in your lane you’re embarrassing your DUMB AZZ. Plants need rays from the sun to produce food (Photosynthesis) 6H2O + 6CO2 ----------> C6H12O6+ 6O2
six molecules of water plus six molecules of carbon dioxide produce one molecule of sugar plus six molecules of oxygen

This is also free moron.

Gawd yer soo branee! Puhleese teech me some moe.

Gawd yer soo branee! Puhleese teech me some moe.

Jarasan, this is what a college education do for you. It makes one able to back up what they say without looking and sounding like an A--HOLE sonny.

That is what they teach 5th graders.

JARASAN, you should be ashamed of yourself. You are trying to downplay your dumbness. Well it didn't work dude.

BTW, this is not taught in 5th grade:6H2O + 6CO2 ----------> C6H12O6+ 6O2
I explained the equation on #8 because I knew you didn't have a clue.